摘要
目的:分析我国道地药材地理标志保护的情况,为道地药材地理标志保护模式及后期我国道地药材地理标志产品培育范围的选择提供实证参考。方法:以《道地药材图典》收录的408种道地药材为研究样本,检索官方网站,分析2020年《地理标志专用标志使用管理办法(试行)》颁布前,三种地理标志保护模式下我国道地药材地理标志保护的分布情况,并对比不同地理区域道地药材产区(西南、华东等7大道地药材产区)及历史阶段道地药材产区(传统道地产区/现代产区)间的地理标志保护情况。结果:我国道地药材地理标志数量呈现先增后降的变化趋势,许多非道地产区的药材获得了地理标志保护。道地药材的地理标志保护模式主要以原国家质量监督检验检疫总局批准的“地理标志产品”为主,药食同源类药材与普通(非食品类)道地药材在地理标志保护方面存在差异;各道地药材产区间的地理标志数量分布不均,保护的侧重点亦有所差异;相比于传统道地产区,新变迁的现代道地产区的地理标志保护力度不够。结论:建议针对道地药材建立单独的认定机制,在地理标志保护模式的选择上,给予地理标志产品一定的优先权;结合各道地药材产区目前地理标志保护的特点,有针对性地加强各产区道地药材地理标志产品的培育,尤其是要加大对道地药材新变迁的现代产区地理标志的挖掘力。
Objective:To analyze the situation in the protection of geographical indications of authentic medicinal materials in China,and to provide empirical references for the protection mode of geographical indications of authentic medicinal materials and the selection of the cultivation range of geographical indications of authentic medicinal materials in the later stage.Methods:Taking the 408 authentic medicinal materials included in the Atlas of Authentic Medicinal Materials as research samples,the official website was searched to analyze the distribution of geographical indication protection of authentic medicinal materials in China under three protection modes before the promulgation of the Administrative Measures for the Use of Special Geographical Indication(Trial)in 2020.The protection of geographical indications between different geographical areas(Southwest,East China and five other areas)and historical stages(traditional areas/modern areas)was compared.Results:The number of geographical indications of authentic medicinal materials in China showed a trend of first increasing and then decreasing,and many medicinal materials in non-authentic producing areas were protected by geographical indications.The geographical indication protection mode of authentic medicinal materials was mainly based on the“geographical indication products”approved by the former General Administration of Quality Supervision,Inspection and Quarantine.There were differences in the protection of geographical indications between the homologous medicinal materials of medicine and food and the ordinary(non-food)authentic medicinal materials.The number of geographical indications was unevenly distributed and the emphasis of protection was also different among the areas of authentic medicinal materials.Compared with the traditional areas of authentic medicinal materials,the protection of geographical indications in the newly changed modern areas of authentic medicinal materials was not enough.Conclusion:A separate identification mechanism for authentic medicinal materials should be established,and priority should be given to geographical indication products in the selection of geographical indication protection mode.According to the characteristics of geographical indication protection in various areas of authentic medicinal materials,the cultivation of geographical indication products of authentic medicinal materials in various areas should be strengthened,especially the exploration of modern geographical indications of authentic medicinal materials.
作者
陈杨
康琪
黄倩倩
Chen Yang;Kang Qi;Huang Qianqian(Sichuan Nursing Vocational College,Chengdu 610100,China;Sichuan College of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Mianyang 621000,China;Southwest Medical University,Luzhou 646000,China)
出处
《中国药事》
2025年第5期517-527,共11页
Chinese Pharmaceutical Affairs
基金
2024年四川省教育厅人文社会科学重点研究基地“四川中医药文化协同发展研究中心”项目——川产道地药材传统知识的保护与挖掘(编号2024XT013)
四川中医药文化与传承中心规划项目——基于中药传统知识保护的道地药材地理标志模式研究(编号SCZZY2023YB05)
四川中医药文化与传承中心规划项目——基于地理标志保护探讨泸州市道地药材现状与发展对策研究(编号SCZZY2023YB06)。
关键词
三轨制
道地药材
地理标志
保护现状
three-track system
authentic medicinal materials
geographical indication
current situation of protection
