期刊文献+

经济毒性相关评估工具的范围综述

Scoping review of financial toxicity assessment tools
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:对国内外经济毒性评估工具进行范围审查,梳理经济毒性评估工具的评分方式、评估内容、构建方法、信效度、应用情况等,为筛选或编制经济毒性评估工具提供参考。方法:根据范围综述研究方法,检索中国知网、维普数据库、万方数据库、PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、CINAHL等国内外数据库中有关经济毒性评估工具的研究,检索时限为建库至2024年10月8日。结果:共纳入34篇符合纳入标准的文献,包含14种经济毒性评估工具,其评估内容以经济状况、心理社会反应或应对行为为主,国内学者开发的经济毒性相关评估工具特异性较强,缺乏普适性。结论:现存的经济毒性评估工具种类较多,但应用于我国患者的信效度有待进一步验证,大多数量表维度不够全面,国内自主开发的量表特异性较强,有待开发出适用于我国文化环境和政策背景的经济毒性评估工具。 Objective:To conduct a scoping review of financial toxicity assessment tools both domestically and internationally,and to summarize their scoring methods,evaluation content,development approaches,reliability/validity,and application status,aiming to provide references for selecting or developing such tools.Methods:Following scoping review methodology,databases including CNKI,VIP,Wanfang,PubMed,Web of Science,Embase,and CINAHL were searched for studies on financial toxicity assessment tools,with the search period spanning from database inception to Oct 8,2024.Results:A total of 34 eligible studies were included,covering 14 financial toxicity assessment tools.These tools primarily focused on economic status,psychosocial responses,or coping behaviors.Tools developed by domestic scholars exhibited strong specificity but lacked generalizability.Conclusions:Existing financial toxicity assessment tools are diverse,yet their reliability and validity in Chinese patient populations require further validation.Most scales lack comprehensive dimensions,and domestically developed tools are overly specific.A universal assessment tool suitable for China's cultural and policy environment needs to be developed.
作者 辛悦 崔仁善 司亚杰 胡雯雯 孙小晴 XIN Yue;CUI Renshan;SI Yajie;HU Wenwen;SUN Xiaoqing(School of Nursing,Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Shenyang 110847,China;Department of Nursing,Medical College of Jiaxing University)
出处 《沈阳医学院学报》 2025年第3期276-281,303,共7页 Journal of Shenyang Medical College
基金 嘉兴市科技局项目(No.2025CGW074)。
关键词 经济毒性 评估工具 范围综述 护理 financial toxicity assessment tools scoping overview nursing
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献77

  • 1刘益群,甘秀妮,唐玮,李湘华.QOL Scale-AMILY在喉癌患者照顾者生活质量评价中的应用[J].中国全科医学,2009,12(9):726-728. 被引量:24
  • 2万崇华,陈明清,张灿珍,汤学良,孟琼,张晓磬.癌症患者生命质量测定量表EORTC QLQ-C30中文版评介[J].实用肿瘤杂志,2005,20(4):353-355. 被引量:1492
  • 3Smith BD,Smith GL, Hurria A,etal. Future of cancer incidence in the United States: Burdens upon an aging, changing nation[J]. J Clin Oncol,2009,27(17) :2758 - 2765.
  • 4Ware JE,Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36 - item short - form health survey (SF- 36): Conceptual framework and item selection[J]. Med Care,1992,30(6):473 -483.
  • 5Hays RD,Sherhourne CD,Mazel R. User's manual for the Medi- cal Outcomes Study (MOS) core measures of health - related quality of life[M]. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1995 : 1.
  • 6Pickard AS, Neary MP, Cella D. Estimation of minimally impor- tant differences in EQ- 5D utility and VAS scores in cancer [J]. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2007,5 : 70.
  • 7Schipper H, Clinch J, McMurray A, et al. Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: The Functional Living Index - Cancer: De- velopment and validation[J]. J Clin Oncol, 1984,2 (5) :472 - 483.
  • 8Cella DF,Tulsky DS,Gray G,et al. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: Development and validation of the general measure[J]. J Clin Onco1,1993,11(3) :570 - 579.
  • 9Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et a l. The European Or- ganization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ - C30: A quality - of - life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology[J]. J Natl Cancer Inst,1993,85(5):365 -376.
  • 10Pompili C, Brunelli A, Xium6 F, et al. Prospective external conver- gence evaluation of two different quality - of - life instruments in lung resection patients[J]. Eur J Cardio - Thorac Surg, 21311,40 (1) :99 - 105.

共引文献542

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部