期刊文献+

Assessing quantitative performance and expert review of multiple deep learning-based frameworks for computed tomography-based abdominal organ auto-segmentation

暂未订购
导出
摘要 Background:Segmentation of abdominal organs in computed tomography(CT)images within clinical oncological workflows is crucial for ensuring effective treatment planning and follow-up.However,manually generated segmentations are time-consuming and labor-intensive in addition to being subject to inter-observer variability.Many deep learning and automated machine learning(AutoML)frameworks have emerged as a solution to this challenge and show promise in clinical workflows.Objective:This study aims to provide a comprehensive evaluation of existing AutoML frameworks(Auto3DSeg,nnU-Net)against a state-of-the-art non-AutoML framework,the Shifted Window U-Net Transformer(SwinUNETR).Methods:Each framework was trained on the same 122 training images,taken from the Abdominal Multi-Organ Segmentation(AMOS)Grand Challenge.Frameworks were compared using dice similarity coefficient(DSC),surface DSC(sDSC),and 95th percentile Hausdorff distances(HD95)on an additional 72 holdout-validation images.The perceived clinical viability of 30 auto-contoured test cases was assessed by three physicians in a blinded evaluation.Results:Comparisons show significantly better performance by AutoML methods:nnU-Net(average DSC:0.924,average sDSC:0.938,average HD95:4.26,median Likert:4.57),Auto3DSeg(average DSC:0.902,average sDSC:0.919,average HD95:8.76,median Likert:4.49),and SwinUNETR(average DSC:0.837,average sDSC:0.844,average HD95:13.93).AutoML frameworks were quantitatively preferred(13/13 organs at risks[OARs]P<0.05 in DSC and sDSC,12/13 OARs P<0.05 in HD95,comparing Auto3DSeg to SwinUNETR,and all OARs P<0.05 in all metrics comparing SwinUNETR to nnU-Net).Qualitatively,nnU-Net was preferred over Auto3DSeg(P=0.0027).Conclusion:The findings suggest that AutoML frameworks offer a significant advantage in the segmentation of abdominal organs,and underscores the potential of AutoML methods to enhance the efficiency of oncological workflows.
出处 《Intelligent Oncology》 2025年第2期160-171,共12页 智能肿瘤学(英文)
基金 funding from the University of Alabama at Birmingham,the National Institutions of Health/National Cancer Institute Award(LRP0000018407) National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences(5KL2TR003097-05).
  • 相关文献

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部