摘要
为了实现监察全覆盖,消除权力监督的真空地带,国家监察体制改革在立法层面逐步下沉到地方监察规范性文件。从地方监察规范性文件的性质上来看,由于纪在法前、纪严于法的原则贯彻不到位;地方监察规范性文件的体系性缺失;监察实体性规则的适用性模糊以及地方监察规范性文件的审查监督缺位,导致实体性规则在数量和质量上远不如程序性规则和组织性规则。完善监察规范性文件实体性规则的立法监督,就要建立双重主体意志的审查机制;实体性衔接的联动机制;实体性争议规范的裁决机制以及实体性规则适用的反馈机制,确保地方监察规范性文件的协调性和实用性,实现高质量发展。
To achieve comprehensive supervisory coverage and eliminate regulatory gaps in power oversight,the reform of the national supervisory system has progressively expanded to encompass the legislative framework of local supervisory regulatory documents.From the perspective of the nature of local supervisory regulatory documents,several issues have contributed to the disparity between substantive rules and procedural/organizational rules in terms of both quantity and quality:the principle of"discipline preceding and stricter than law"has not been fully realized;systemic coherence within local supervisory regulatory documents is insufficient;the applicability of substantive supervisory rules remains unclear;and there is a lack of effective review and oversight mechanisms for such documents.To enhance the legislative oversight of substantive rules in supervisory regulatory documents,it is crucial to establish a dual-subject will review mechanism,a substantive coherence linkage mechanism,an adjudication mechanism for substantive regulatory disputes,and a feedback mechanism for the application of substantive rules.These measures will ensure the coordination and practicality of local supervisory regulatory documents,thereby promoting high-quality development in this domain.
作者
郭炳辰
GUO Bingchen(Shanxi University,School of Law,Taiyuan 030031,China)
出处
《太原学院学报(社会科学版)》
2025年第4期52-62,共11页
Journal of Taiyuan University(Social Science Edition)
基金
山西省法学会课题(SXLS(2024)B03)。
关键词
地方监察规范性文件
备案审查机制
监察法规
实体性规则
local supervisory regulatory documents
filing and review mechanism
supervisory regulations
substantive rules