摘要
辩护方式的冲突俨然成为立法运行中的常态化问题,现有的诸多方案存在各自的解释困境。按照“日常语言—政治学预设—法律语义”的递进梯度剖析“同意”的语义解释,结合“同意”精神在法律规范中的显现,归纳“同意”在实践中体现的以自愿性协商权利内涵、权利处分为代表的一系列被追诉人的自主表达形态。明确被追诉人为同意主体,合理地认定其同意的行为能力,划分同意的结果承担范围。借鉴域外经验,提倡司法机关承担告知和风险提示义务,引入程序性制裁,保障签署“辩护方式选择决定书”为核心的形式同意和自愿性审查为核心的实质同意构成要件的实现,解决困扰的实践难题。
The conflict of defense methods has become a normal problem in the operation of legislation,and many existing solutions have their own interpretation dilemmas.According to the progressive gradient of“everyday language-political presupposition-legal semantics”,the semantic interpretation of“consent”is analyzed,combined with the manifestation of the spirit of“consent”in legal norms,and a series of autonomous expression forms of the accused represented by the connotation of voluntary consultation rights and the disposition of rights embodied in“consent”in practice are summarized.Clarify that the defendant is the consenting subject,reasonably determine its capacity to consent,and divide the scope of bearing the results of consent.Drawing on extraterritorial experience,it is recommended that judicial organs undertake the obligation of notification and risk warning,introduce procedural sanctions,and ensure that the formal consent with the signing of the“decision on the choice of defense method”and the substantive consent with voluntary review as the core are realized constitutively,so as to solve the troubled practical problems.
出处
《贸大法学》
2024年第1期222-236,共15页
Uibe Legal Science
基金
2022年度成都理工大学校级科研立项一般项目“RCEP背景下民营企业刑事合规问题研究”(项目编号CX2022-091),部分研究成果
关键词
被告人同意理论
指定辩护
委托辩护
Defendant’S Consent Theory
Appoints Defense
Entrusts Defense
