摘要
事实认定理念的转变与诉讼体制的转型并不同步。当事人主义诉讼体制中,事实认定绝对性理念的传统影响力依然存在,并且与事实探知的相对性理念共同参与到预决效力、自认、调查取证、同案同判等制度的设计中。作为结果,这些制度不同程度地表现出了内在逻辑的矛盾与具体适用的冲突。预决效力制度与案件事实的差异性之间存在着天然的张力。事实认定的相对性在否定预决效力的同时,也决定了已决事实原则上只能产生事实上的影响力,在满足严苛条件时,例外地具有争点效这种法律约束力。事实认定理念对具体的制度设计有着根本性的影响力,回归原点能更好地解决相关的制度争议。
The transformation of the concept of fact-finding is not synchronous with the transition of thelitigation system.In the adversarial litigation system,the traditional influence of the concept of absolute-ness of fact-findig still exists,and the influence along with the relativity of fact-finding is involved inthe design of legal systems such as pre-determined effect,admission,investigation and evidence collec-tion,and consistent judgments in similar cases.As a result,these systems,to varying degrees,showcontradictions in internal logic and conflicts in concrete application.'There is an inherent tension betweenthe pre-determined effect and the differences in case facts.'The relativity of fact-finding,while deny-ing the pre-determined effect,also determines that,in principle,adjudicated facts can only generatefactual influence and have the issue preclusion when strict conditions are met.'The concept of fact-find-ing has a fundamental influence on the design of specific institutions,so returming to the origin can betterresolve these disputes.
作者
冉博
RAN Bo(Laxe School,University of International Relations,Beijing 100091,China)
出处
《太原理工大学学报(社会科学版)》
2025年第2期60-68,共9页
Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology(Social Science Edition)
基金
国家社会科学基金一般项目“执行法典化背景下的债务人异议之诉体系化研究”(23BFX138)。
关键词
事实认定的相对性
预决效力
事实上的影响力
争点效
免证事实
relativity of fact-finding
pre-determined effect
factual influence
issue preclusion
proof-free facts
