摘要
边疆民族地区网络意识形态治理作为维护国家安全、民族团结,实现边疆民族地区繁荣发展的重要组成部分,在国家网络安全体系中发挥着不可替代的作用。当前,以ChatGPT、Sora为代表的生成类人工智能正以全新的意识形态工具属性重构网络意识形态传播格局。其暗网化、去媒体化以及独特的算法训练与舆论引导机制,使得边疆民族地区面临着信息推送偏见与算法默认歧视、多元文化碰撞以及数据安全与内容滥用等多重网络意识形态治理风险,这些风险不但来自美西方的网络意识形态渗透,还源于边疆民族地区文化意识形态领域的风险抬头以及AI网络治理技术的滞后。因此,唯有坚持以铸牢中华民族共同体意识为价值引领,通过强化顶层设计、加强技术治理能力建设、促进边疆经济社会发展及创新意识形态内容生产等措施,不断提升边疆民族地区网络意识形态治理水平,以此实现维护边疆民族地区长治久安。
The network ideological security of ethnic minority border areas is linked to the stability of the border society and constitutes an indispensable part of the overall national security.In recent years,generative artificial intelligence products have emerged in rapid succession.Currently,generative artificial intelligence,exemplified by Chat-GPT and Sora,is reshaping the network's ideological communication pattern with its ideological tool attributes.Its unique algorithm mechanisms,dark web-like dissemination methods,and powerful information generation abilities profoundly changed the production and dissemination pattern of traditional network ideology.The new communication form of generative artificial intelligence is inherently influenced by the ideology of its designers or the country of its origin due to the underlying algorithm design and data training processes.It possesses the attribute of being an ideological communication tool.Therefore,when dealing with sensitive issues such as developing China's border areas and ethnic policies,generative artificial intelligence may lead to information push biases,algorithm-based discrimination,multicultural conflicts,data security issues,and content abuse in border ethnic areas.These problems can easily exacerbate social divisions in border lands and conflicts between different groups,triggering cultural identity crises and the alienation of ethnic minority cultures,thereby impacting the long-term stability of border areas.The embedding of generative artificial intelligence in border ethnic areas encounters numerous challenges for the following reasons:First,there is the hegemonic infiltration of Western network ideology,with the United States being a prime example.Currently,the West's technological advantage in AI remains unchanged.Especially in the field of generative artificial intelligence,Western countries,led by the United States,still maintain a significant technological edge.Coupled with their international discourse hegemony,they can easily use generative artificial intelligence to conduct ideological infiltration in non-Western countries and undermine their ideological positions.Second,risks in the cultural and ideological fields are on the rise.Against the backdrop of generative artificial intelligence applications,social culture is increasingly manifested in the network space.The customs,religious beliefs,and languages of border ethnic areas are constantly changing and evolving in the interaction process with generative artificial intelligence.This has led to the rising trends of entertainment-oriented,ethnic-centric,and nihilistic views of border history in the network space,seriously challenging the mainstream position of socialist core values in border areas.Third,there is a lag in network technology governance in border ethnic areas:These areas have significant disparities with inland regions of China and developed Western territories in terms of AI network governance technology,governance talents,and governance infrastructure.Therefore,with the support of generative artificial intelligence technology,governance traditions,logic,and structures of border ethnic areas will inevitably be affected,and the drawbacks of AI technology governance will be particularly evident.Therefore,in the face of the risks to network ideological governance in border ethnic areas brought about by generative artificial intelligence,these areas must consistently adhere to the value guidance of consolidating the consciousness of the Chinese national community,take the security of network ideology in border ethnic areas as their core,lay a solid foundation for economic development,and innovate and improve the network ideological communication discourse system in these lands,in order to achieve effective governance and prevention of network ideology in border ethnic areas.
作者
字荣耀
Zi Rongyao(Yunnan Normal University,Kunming,650000,Yunnan,China;Yunnan Social Science Academy,Kunming,650000,Yunnan,China)
出处
《民族学刊》
北大核心
2025年第3期83-91,156,共10页
Journal of Ethnology
基金
国家社会科学基金哲学社会科学领军人才项目“当代中国边疆治理理论与实践研究”(22VRC051)
云南省社会科学院委托项目“多民族地区乡村治理共同体建设研究”(TBWT202203)
“乡村振兴背景下民族特色村寨文旅发展研究”(ZX202302)阶段性成果。
关键词
生成类人工智能
边疆民族地区
网络意识形态治理
风险防范
generative artificial intelligence
network ideology governance
frontier ethnic minority areas
risk prevention
