摘要
《尚书》诸篇的辑佚辨伪工作虽蔚为大观,然以《禹贡》为例,诸家汲汲于饾饤名物或考释句词,致使《禹贡》研究长期聚讼纷纭而难有恒论。《禹贡》之写定年代固难断定,但综览多方材料,以流变性的眼光对《禹贡》文本的生成模式进行梳理,应是学人关注重点。历史时期的《禹贡》不唯一般意义上的经典文献,而是直接与现实情况相涉,在水利工程、边疆治患、地名更替等方面皆有不同程度上的指导意义,亦在经典与现实的往复交互下实现持续的“经典化”。在《禹贡》研究中,不被简单先验的“二重证据法”思维束缚,上求《禹贡》文本生成的动态过程,下索经典与现实间的内在张力,当为可靠路径。
Although the work of compiling and distinguishing the lost and false articles in Shangshu is a great sight,taking Tribute of Yu as an example,the scholars are so absorbed in the research of the famous things or the explanation of the sentences,that the study of Tribute of Yu has been divided into many disputes for a long time.It is difficult to determine the chronology of Tribute of Yu,but scholars should pay attention to the various materials and the mode of production of Tribute of Yu from the perspective of rheology.Tribute of Yu is not only a classical work in the general sense,but also directly related to the actual situation.It has guiding significance to different degrees in the aspects of hydraulic engineering,treatment of diseases in the frontier areas and the replacement of place names,is also in the classic and reality of the reciprocating interaction to achieve a sustained“classicalization”.In the study of Tribute of Yu,we are not bound by the simple apriori thought of“double evidence method”,but seek the dynamic process of the text generation of Tribute of Yu and the inherent tension between the classical and the reality,when a reliable path.
作者
杨宇鲲
Yang Yukun(School of History,Nanjing University,Nanjing,China)
出处
《社会科学论坛》
2025年第3期235-244,共10页
Tribune of Social Sciences
关键词
《禹贡》
经典化
二重证据法
Tribute of Yu
canonization
double evidence method
