期刊文献+

智能座舱人机交互界面人因安全评价方法 被引量:1

Evaluation methodology of human factors safety in HMI of intelligent cockpits
原文传递
导出
摘要 随着智能座舱技术的发展,汽车大屏及多屏化触控交互界面越发普及。提升驾驶体验的同时,驾驶分心风险也随之增大。通过人因试验研究方法,设计不同驾驶分心试验任务,收集在不同试验下驾驶员的驾驶表现与视觉特征数据,挖掘智能座舱触控屏人机交互界面引发的视觉、操作和认知分心及其对驾驶安全的影响,并建立汽车人机交互界面人因安全评价体系,验证评价模型的有效性。结果表明,视觉分心对驾驶安全影响最大,分心程度随驾驶任务难度的增加而增加。 With the advancement of smart cockpit technology,large screens and multi-screen touch interaction interfaces have become increasingly prevalent in vehicles.As the driving experience improves,so does the risk of driving distraction.This study employed various driver distraction tasks using human factors experimental research methods to collect driving performance and visual characteristics data under different experimental conditions.The effects of vision,operation,and cognitive distractions on driving safety induced by touch screen human-machine interfaces in smart cockpits were studied.A human factors safety evaluation system for automotive human-machine interfaces was established to validate the effectiveness of the evaluation model.The results indicated that visual distraction had the most significant impact on driving safety.The level of distraction increased with the difficulty of the driving task.
作者 梁洲硕 钱成 杜泓江 王亚辉 LIANG Zhoushuo;QIAN Cheng;DU Hongjiang;WANG Yahui(School of Medical Technology,Beijing Institute of Technology,Beijing 100081;Changan Automobile Co.,Ltd.,Chongqing 400023)
出处 《机械设计》 北大核心 2025年第3期195-200,共6页 Journal of Machine Design
基金 人因工程全国重点试验室项目(HFNKL2023WW02) 北京市自然科学基金(9244037) 北京理工大学科研启动计划(3320012222316)。
关键词 人机界面 智能座舱 触控交互 分心 人因安全 HMI intelligent cockpit touch interaction distraction human factor safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献60

  • 1施煜,孙运传,陈丹阳.《欧洲物联网研究战略路线图》系列之四 未来物联网标识技术及标准化重点研究领域[J].中国自动识别技术,2010(6):50-52. 被引量:2
  • 2武安娜,王颖,张伟.驾驶模拟条件下移动电话对驾驶绩效影响研究[J].人类工效学,2007,13(3):44-46. 被引量:9
  • 3Klauer S G, Dingus T A, Neale V L, et al. The impact of driver inattention on near-crash/crash risk : An analysis using the lO0-car naturalistic driving study data[R]. NATHSA, 2006.
  • 4Lee J D, Young K L, Regan M A. Defining driver distraction[J].Driver Distraction:Theory, Effects, and Mitigation, 2008,13(4) : 31 -40.
  • 5Victor T W, Harbluk J L, Engstr~m J A. Sensitivity of eye-movement measures to in-vehicle task difficulty[J]. Transpor- tation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour,2005,8(2) :167- 190.
  • 6Wickens C D. The structure of attentional resources[J]. Attention and Performance VIII, 1980,8(4):33 -36.
  • 7Massel L, Harbluk J. The impact of performing cognitive tasks on drivers~braking behavior[C]. Proceedings of the Canadi- an Muhidisciplinary Road Safety Conference XII,2006:1 -8.
  • 8Harbluk J L, Noy Y I, Eizenman M. The impact of cognitive distraction on driver visual behaviour and vehicle control[R]. Transport Canada, 2002.
  • 9Liang Y, Reyes M L, Lee J D. Real-time detection of driver cognitive distraction using support vector machines[J]. Intelligent Transportation Systems, IEEE Transactions on,2007,8 (2) : 340 - 350.
  • 10Tivesten E, Dozza M. Driving context and visual-manual phone tasks influence glance behavior in naturalistic driving[J].Transportation research part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour,2014,26(4):258 -272.

共引文献117

同被引文献28

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部