期刊文献+

论美国生物育种安全法律制度

Safety Legal System of Biological Breeding Technology in the United States
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 生物育种技术作为农业科技进步的重要驱动力,正处于快速发展的关键时期,如何保障生物育种技术的安全研发与应用成为难题。基于此,世界各国纷纷制定相应的法律法规进行监管。美国作为生物育种先驱国家,拥有较为完善的生物育种安全法律制度。与之相比,中国生物育种技术虽发展迅猛,但在安全法律规制方面仍面临不少挑战和问题。因此,吸收借鉴世界育种强国安全法律制度精华,为我国生物育种监管提供路径选择,显得紧迫而必要。本文从比较分析视角出发,聚焦于美国生物育种培育、审定及推广三个环节,通过分析考察美国政府在各环节中的制度设定及法律规定,从监管模式、产品审定和标识规定及激励制度四个方面,为我国生物育种安全管理模式提出改进建议。 Biological breeding technology is an important driving force for the advancement of agriculture,and it is currently in a critical period of rapid development.How to ensure the safety of biological breeding technology research and application has become a difficult problem.Under this background,various countries around the world have successively formulated laws and regulations for supervision.As a pioneer in biological breeding technology around the world,the United States has a better safety legal system for the biological breeding technology.Compared with the United States,the biological breeding industry in China has developed at a faster pace,but there are still many challenges and problems in the safety legal supervision system.Therefore,it is urgent and necessary to draw on the essence of advanced legal supervision experience to provide the selection for the supervision of biological breeding technology in China.From the perspective of comparative analysis,this paper focuses on the cultivation,examination and promotion to analyze the legislation and regulations in all aspects of biological breeding technology in the United States.And then it puts forward suggestions to improve the safety supervision of biological breeding technology in China from four dimensions:supervision mode,examination process,labeling regulation and incentive system.
作者 张黄亦檬 郭渝丹 Huangyimeng Zhang;Yudan Guo(School of Law and Sociology,Chongqing Technology and Business University,Chongqing)
出处 《法学(汉斯)》 2025年第3期466-474,共9页 Open Journal of Legal Science
关键词 生物育种技术 安全性 监管 法律法规 Biological Breeding Technology Safety Supervision Legislation and Regulations
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献46

  • 1Clive James.. Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Cropr.2006(ISAAABriefNo. 35). ISAAA: Ithaca,NY. [DB/OL]..农业生物技术应用国际服务组织网 http:/www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/35/defaulthtml,, (2007-01-18)..
  • 2J. MADELEINE NASH. Grains of Hope [J]. Time (2000Vol.156,Num.5) :41.
  • 3JOHN S.APPLEGATE. The Prometheus Principle:Using the Precautionary Principle to Harmonize the Regulation of GeneticaUy Modified Organisms [J]. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies.2001,(9): 223.
  • 4MATTHEW RICH.The Debate Over Genetically Modified Crops in the United States :R.eassessment of Notions of Harm, Difference, and Choice[J].Case W. Res.2004,(54): 902.
  • 5MARGARET ROSS GROSSMAN. Biotechnology, Property Rights and the Environment [J].AM.J.COMP.L.2001,(50):224.
  • 621 U.S.C. § 301-399 (2003).
  • 7FDA,“Statement of Policy: Foods Derived fi-om New Plant Varieties”.Federal Register, Vol. 57, No. 104 (1992) [DB/OL].美国FDA官方网 http://www.cfsan.fda. gov/~acrobat/fr920529.pdf. (2007-01-18).
  • 8FDA.“Draft Guidance for Industry: Voluntary Labeling Indicating Whether Foods Have or Have Not Been Developed Using Bioengineering”January 17, 2001 [DB/OL]. 美国FDA官方网 http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~lrd/../~dms/biolabgu.html (2007-01-18).
  • 9EMILY ROBER.TSON. Finding a Compromise in the Debate Over Genetically Modified Food:an Introduction to a Model State Consumer Right-to-Know Act[J]. B.U.J. Sci. & Tech. L.2003,(9): 166.
  • 10FRED H. DEGNAN. Biotechnology and the Food Label:A Legal Perspective[J].Food & Drug L.J. 2000,(55):308-309.

共引文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部