摘要
美国域外民事单边取证中,美方法院往往将美国利益或者美国原告的利益以及获得所需证据的效率摆在尤为突出的位置,在利用长臂管辖权确立对于我国被取证主体的特定属人管辖权的基础上,一方面拒绝《海牙取证公约》的适用,另一方面则在礼让原则中坚持片面的利己思维。在中美域外取证的冲突中,美国只有在使用《海牙取证公约》是徒劳的或其程序被证明无益时,才能转而适用其国内法允许的方式。未来我国需要丰富《海牙取证公约》的履约手段,提高履约效率,同时对我国的阻断立法进行升级和改造,使美国在国际礼让分析中作出让步,必要时我国可采取对等手段,对外国当事人在华非法取证行为进行制裁。
In the U.S.extraterritorial civil unilateral evidence collection,the U.S.Court of Justice often places the U.S.interests or the interests of the U.S.plaintiff and the efficiency of obtaining the required evidence in a particularly prominent position.On the basis of using longarm jurisdiction to establish specific personal jurisdiction over the subject of evidence collection in our country,on the one hand,it rejects the application of the Hague Evidence Convention,on the other hand,it insists on one-sided self-interested thinking in international comity.In the conflict between China and the United States in obtaining evidence outside the territory,the United States can only switch to the method permitted by its domestic law when the use of the Hague Convention on Evidence is futile or the procedures prove to be useless.In the future,our country needs to enrich the implementation methods of the Hague Evidence Convention,improve the efficiency of performance,and at the same time upgrade and reform our country's blocking statutes,forcing the United States to make concessions in the analysis of international comity.When necessary,our country can adopt reciprocal measures to impose sanctions on foreign parties'illegal evidence collection in China.
出处
《盛京法律评论》
2023年第2期132-153,共22页
Shengjing Law Review
关键词
域外单边取证
海牙取证公约
阻断立法
国际礼让原则
extraterritorial civil unilateral evidence collection
hague evidence convention
blocking statutes
international comity
