摘要
根据新修改《档案法实施条例》第五十一条的规定,档案服务企业所受行政处罚决定应在社会层面公开。引入这一制度,能够发挥监督档案执法活动、预防档案违法风险、惩戒档案违法行为等多重功能。根据其具有影响档案服务企业利益的制裁属性,以及由档案主管部门负责实施的权力属性,档案处罚决定的公开,不应归类为政府信息公开这一事实行为或行政处罚这一法律行为,而是作为一项独立规制措施。在此性质定位下,需要为公开档案处罚决定配置以控权为底色的制度内容,明确“以不公开为原则、公开为例外”的基本立场,并设计相应的判定标准、技术要点、程序规范等具体规则。
According to Article 51 of the newly revised Regulations for the Implementation of the Archives Lazw,the administrative punishment decisions imposed on archives service enterprises shall be made public at the public level.The introduction of this system can play multiple functions such as supervising archives law enforcement activities,preventing the risk of archives violations,and punishing archives violations.According to its sanction nature that affects the interests of archives service enterprises,as well as the nature of the power that the archives department is responsible for implementing,the disclosure of archives punishment decisions should not be classified as a factual act of government information disclosure or a legal act of administrative punishment,but as an independent regulatory measure.Under this positioning,it is necessary to configure the system content with control as the background for the punishment decision of public archives,clarify the basic position of"non-disclosure as the principle and disclosure as the exception",and design corresponding specific rules such as judgment standards,technical points,and procedural specifications.
作者
苗运卫
MIAO Yunwei(Law School,Southeast University,Nanjing 211189,China)
出处
《档案学通讯》
北大核心
2025年第2期82-90,共9页
Archives Science Bulletin
基金
江苏省社会科学基金重点项目“数字时代行政机关公开负面信息研究”
江苏省研究生科研与实践创新计划项目“算法行政方式的程序法治研究”。
关键词
行政处罚
档案行政处罚
行政处罚决定
信息公开
Administrative punishments
Archival administrative punishment
Administrative punishment decision
Information disclosure
