摘要
【目的】在法律界存在对在著作权领域保护知识产权就是保护创新的认识不足的现象,需要从著作权法基本规则出发,对不当乃至错误观点予以澄清。【方法】根据《WIP0公约》《TRIPS协定》等相关知识产权国际公约规定,知识产权客体是内在新和形式新的统一。通过工业产权内在新与著作权内在新的比较,寻求著作权客体内在新的特质。【结果】工业产权特别是专利的内在新具有显性特质,著作权的内在新蕴涵于独创性规定之“创性”中,具有隐性特质。【结论】著作权法中丰富多彩的“创”的方式,使著作权客体内在新具有异彩缤纷的“新”的内容,著作权法不仅保护蕴含创新本质的作品,而且保护再创作和再创新。
[Purposes]In the legal profession,there is a lack of understanding that the protection of intellectual property rights in the field of copyright is to protect innovation.Therefore,it is necessary to clarify the improper and even wrong views from the basic rules of copyright law.[Methods]According to the relevant international conventions on intellectual property rights such as the"Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights"and the"World Intellectual Property Organization Copyright Treaty",the object of intellectual property rights is the unity of internal newness and new form.Through the comparison between the inherent newness of industrial property rights and the inherent newness of copyright,this paper aims to seek the inherent new characteristics of the object of copyright.[Findings]The inherent newness of industrial property rights,especially patents,has explicit characteristics,and the inherent newness of copyright is implicit in the'creativity'of original provisions.[Conclusions]The rich and colorful ways of"creation"in the copyright law make the object of copyright have colorful"new"content.The copyright law not only protects the works containing the essence of innovation,but also protects re-creation and re-innovation.
作者
东村仁
DONG Cunren(Henan University of Economics and Law,Zhengzhou 450000,China)
出处
《河南科技》
2025年第3期107-111,共5页
Henan Science and Technology
关键词
著作权
独创性
显性创新
隐性创新
copyright
originality
explicit innovation
implicit innovation
