摘要
范畴综述、图谱综述以及证据差距图谱相比于经典的系统评价类型研究问题更加宽泛,因此被划分为“big picture review”家族。三种证据综合类型近年来发展迅速,然而相关概念容易混淆。本文在“big picture review”家族三种证据综合类型方法学指南的基础上,梳理各自方法学发展历程,总结三种证据综合方法研究目的和方法学操作方面的相同点和不同点。笔者期望本文能够帮助国内研究者区分和辨别三种证据综合类型,避免概念的混淆,根据研究目的正确选择“big picture review”家族的证据综合类型。
Compared with classic systematic reviews,the scoping reviews,mapping reviews and evidence gap maps(EGMs)address broader research questions.Therefore,they are classified into the"big picture review"family.These three types of evidence synthesis have developed rapidly in recent years,but the related concepts are easy to be confused.This article introduces the methodological development process of the three types of evidence synthesis,summarizes the similarities and differences in terms of research purposes and methodology based on the methodological guidelines of the three types of evidence synthesis in the"big picture review"family.The author hopes that this article can help domestic researchers distinguish and identify the three types of evidence synthesis,avoid conceptual confusion,and correctly choose the type of evidence synthesis in the"big picture review"family according to the research purpose.
作者
韩舒羽
蔡加琦
焦雪萍
王志稳
HAN Shuyu;CAI Jiaqi;JIAO Xueping;WANG Zhiwen(School of Nursing Peking University,Beijing 100191,P.R.China;Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shanxi Medical University,Taiyuan 030013,P.R.China;Peking University Health Science Centre for Evidence-Based Nursing,Beijing 100191,P.R.China)
出处
《中国循证医学杂志》
北大核心
2025年第2期244-248,共5页
Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
基金
北京大学循证护理专项基金(编号:XZJJ-2023-12)。
