摘要
传统的学术评价主要依赖于期刊的影响因子和论文的被引频次,过度强调数量而非质量,忽视跨学科研究的重要性;新的评价体系则强调多元评价标准和质量导向。不同学术评价体系下,科技期刊的发展路径也呈现出多样化的趋势。探讨学术评价改革对科技期刊带来的影响,明确自身定位和办刊方向,有助于其探索符合自身特点的发展路径,真正实现高质量发展,以更好地发挥促进学术创新的作用。
Traditional academic evaluation mainly relies on the influencing factors of journals and the citation frequency of papers,overemphasizing quantity rather than quality and neglecting the importance of interdisciplinary research;The new evaluation system emphasizes diverse evaluation criteria and quality orientation.Under different academic evaluation systems,the development path of scientific journals also shows a diversified trend.Exploring the influences of academic evaluation reform on scientific journals and clarifying their own positioning and publishing direction can help scientific journals explore development paths that are in line with their own characteristics,truly achieve high-quality development,and better play the role of promoting academic innovation.
作者
赵阳
ZHAO Yang(Department of Academic Journal,Changchun University of Chinese Medicine,Changchun 130117,China)
出处
《长春大学学报》
2024年第12期53-56,共4页
Journal of Changchun University
基金
吉林省社会科学基金项目(2020A14)
吉林省高教学会研究项目(JGJX24C060)。
关键词
学术评价改革
科技期刊
影响
academic evaluation reform
scientific journals
influence
