期刊文献+

全子宫切除术式选择的多因素回归分析 被引量:1

Factors influendng the choice of hysterectomy types
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的回顾性分析决定全子宫切除术术式选择的临床因素,评估手术医师在其中所起的作用。方法 对285例全子宫切除术患者按照不同术式分为3组,各组间进行多因素Logistic回归分析。结果 内窥镜妇科医师明显倾向实施LH,OR值分别为13.9和11.5。伴有附件切除和子宫大(>280 g)的病例接受腹式全子宫切除术的机会显著增加.OR值分别为0.1和0.2。子宫阴道脱垂的病例更倾向接受阴式全子宫切除术,OR值为23.1。结论手术医师的经验、伴随附件切除、子宫大小和一些临床指征对全子宫切除术有独立和重要的影响。 Objective To identify factors influencing the choice of hysterectomy type and to evaluate the role of surgeons in the decision making process. Methods 285 patients were divided into three groups according to the hysterectomy type (AH, VH and LH) . Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent factors influencing the choice of hysterectomy type. Results Endoscopic gynaecologists preferred LH than either AH or VH, with an odd ratio of 13.9 and 11.5 respectively. Patients with increased uterine size ( weight > 280 g) had more chance of undergoing AH than either VH or LH, with an odd ratio of 0.05 and 0.1 respectively. In addition, concomitant adnexal surgery increased the likelihood of undergoing AH than either VH or LH, with an odd ratio of 0.1 and 0.2 respectively. Patients with vaginal prolapse were more likely to undergo VH compared to AH, with an odd ratio of 23.1. Conclusion Surgeons' expertise play an important role in selection of hysterectomy type and patient' s characteristics also contribute to decision making.
出处 《广东医学》 CAS CSCD 2002年第12期1251-1254,共4页 Guangdong Medical Journal
关键词 全子宫切除术 腹腔镜 术式 多因素分析 手术医师经验 Hysterectomy Factor analysis Statistical Surgeon's expertis
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1[1]Kovac SR. Vaginal hysterectomy Baillieres. Clin Obs Gyn, 1997,11(1): 95
  • 2[2]Reich H, DeCaprio J, McGlynn F. Laparoscologic hysterectomy. J Gynecol Surg, 1989, 5:213
  • 3[3]Ovac SR, Cruikshank SH, Retto HF. Laparoscopy - assisted vaginal hysterectomy. J Gynecol Surg, 1990, 6:185
  • 4[4]Herve F, Christophe A, Sylie C, et al. Hysterectomy for benign uterine disease: the effect off the introduction of lap-ic - assisted hysterectomy on the selection of surgical access. Gynaecological Endoscopy, 2000, 9:167
  • 5[5]Orsey JH, Steinberg EP, Holtz PM. Clinical indication for hysterectomy route: patient characteristics or physician preferece? Am J Obstet Gynec,1995, 173:1452
  • 6[6]Currie I, Onwude JL, Jarvis GJ. A comparative study of the cosmetic appeal of abdominal incisions used for hysterectomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 1996,103:252
  • 7[7]Marana R, Busacca M, Zupi E, et al. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus to abdominal hysterectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynec, 1999, 180:270
  • 8[8]Wilcox LS, Koonin LM, Pokras R, et al. Hysterectomy in the United States, 1988~1990. Obstet Gynec, 1994, 83:549
  • 9[9]Magos A, Bournas N, Sinha R, et al. Vaginal hysterectomy for the large uterus. Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 1996, 103:246

同被引文献4

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部