摘要
以中国30个省(自治区、直辖市)作为研究区域,从新劳动者、新劳动对象以及新生产资料三个核心维度对新质生产力的发展水平进行了全面评估,深入分析了影响新质生产力发展水平的各种因素。研究发现,在样本期间内中国新质生产力的发展水平实现了年均7.64%的提升;新质生产力的前期积累对当期发展产生了积极的正向循环和显著的示范效应,进一步推动了新质生产力发展的“提升效应”;技术创新、产业结构升级、市场化水平、政府干预对新质生产力发展水平存在显著的促进作用;各因素在不同时期或不同地域对新质生产力发展的贡献程度具有显著差异性。因此,要因地制宜发展新质生产力,不断拓宽新质生产力的发展空间;需坚持有效市场与有为政府有机结合,协力推动科技创新;应坚持以市场为导向,以人才为支撑,以产业为基础,以区域合作为纽带,推动生产力不断向前发展。
Taking 30 provinces in China as the research objects,the development level of new quality productive forces is comprehensively evaluated from the three core dimensions of new workers,new labor objects and new means of production,and various factors affecting the development level of new quality productive forces are deeply analyzed.It is found that during the sample period,the development level of new quality productivity in China achieved an average annual increase of 7.64%.The early accumulation of new quality productivity produced a positive cycle and significant demonstration effect on the current development,and further promoted the"promotion effect"of the development of new quality productivity.Technological innovation,industrial structure upgrading,marketization level and government intervention significantly promoted the development level in different periods or different regions.Therefore,it is necessary to develop new quality productive forces according to local conditions and continuously expand the development space of new quality productive forces.We should adhere to the organic combination of effective market and competent government to promote scientific and technological innovation.We should be market-oriented,supported by talents,industry-based and regional cooperation to promote the continuous development of productive forces.
作者
曹冲
CAO Chong(School of Economics and Management,West Anhui University,Lu'an 237012,Anhui,China)
出处
《铜仁学院学报》
2024年第6期103-114,共12页
Journal of Tongren University
基金
2023年度安徽省社会科学创新发展研究课题“共同富裕下大别山革命老区农村居民收入结构差异及持续增收研究”(2023CX013)
安徽省高等学校科学研究项目“合肥都市圈市场一体化发展对区域就业结构的影响:内在机理、经验证据与政策优化研究”(2022AH051664)。
关键词
新质生产力
评价指标体系
影响因素
贡献程度
new quality productivity
assessment indicator system
influencing factors
contribution degree
