摘要
汉代经学中,存在着经书传注的口传传统。通过对几则经学史文献的意义澄清,可以重现汉代经学传注口头传统。再由汉代口传传注文献的梳理,可以进而考察汉代学术两大公案:一为西汉孔安国确曾注《论语》《孝经》,但在后世只有口传,因而引起误解;一为向歆父子校书仅针对书面文献,而未致力于将口传文献著于竹帛。与此同时,有必要强调,汉代经学传注的口传传统,是以书面经书为中心,并围绕书面经书而形成与发展的。
In the study of Confucian classics during the Han Dynasty,there existed an oral tradition of annotations.By clarifying the significance of several historical documents related to Confucian classics study,the oral tradition of annotations can be reconstructed.Furthermore,by examining the oral annotations of Confucian classics in the Han Dynasty,two major issues in Han scholarship can be addressed:First,Kong Anguo in the Western Han Dynasty did annotate the Analects of Confucius and the Book of Filial Piety,but these annotations were only transmitted orally in later generations,leading to misunderstandings.Second,Liu Xiang and Liu Xin focused their proofreading efforts solely on written texts,without committing to documenting the oral tradition of the Confucian classics in writing.Additionally,it is important to emphasize that the oral tradition of annotations in Han Dynasty Confucian classics study was centered around written Confucian classics and developed in relation to them.
作者
李若晖
LI Ruo-hui(School of Chinese Classics,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China)
出处
《东北师大学报（哲学社会科学版）》
北大核心
2025年第1期91-98,共8页
Journal of Northeast Normal University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)
基金
国家社会科学基金冷门绝学研究专项学者个人项目(22VJXG051)。
关键词
经学
经书
书面
口传
孔安国
向歆校书
Confucian Classics Study
Confucian Classics
Writing
Orality
Kong Anguo
Liu Xiang And Liu Xin Proofread The Books
