摘要
近年来,行政复议角色定位发生转变,使得其实质性化解功能愈为显著。在《行政复议法》修订并实施后,“调撤结案”已然成为实现行政争议案结事了的代表性结案方式。为充分发挥“调撤结案”之实质性化解功能,排除程序空转隐患,复议机关必须在原则和程序两个方面遵循科学公正的基本规则,尤其应根据三种相异情形对撤回复议申请进行不同程度审查,力求作出行政复议调解书。
In recent years,the role positioning of administrative reconsideration has changed,making its substantive resolution function more and more significant.After the revision and implementation of the Administrative Review Law,the"transfer and withdrawal of case closure"has become the representative way to realize the settlement of administrative disputes.In order to give full play to the substantive resolution function of"transferring the case closing"and eliminate the hidden danger of procedure idling,the reconsideration organ must follow the basic rules of science and justice in the two aspects of principles and procedures,especially examine the different degrees of withdrawing reconsideration application according to the three different situations,and strive to make the conciliation statement of administrative reconsideration.
作者
吴毅军
Wu Yijun(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042)
出处
《安徽警官职业学院学报》
2024年第5期13-21,共9页
Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Police Officers
关键词
调撤结案
实质性化解行政争议
行政复议调解
实质法治
Final settlement
substantive resolution of administrative disputes
administrative reconsideration mediation
substantive rule of law
