期刊文献+

个性化钛网联合屏障膜对上前牙骨缺损患者GBR修复效果及PES评分的影响

The Effect of Personalized Titanium Mesh Combined with Barrier Membrane in GBRRepair for Patients with Upper Anterior Teeth Bone Defects and Its Impact on PESScore
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:探讨个性化钛网联合屏障膜对上前牙骨缺损患者引导骨再生(Guided bone regeneration,GBR)修复效果及红色美学指数(Pink esthetic score,PES)评分的影响。方法:回顾性分析2020年12月-2022年5月笔者医院就诊的208例上前牙牙槽骨缺损患者病例资料,患者均行GBR术,根据术中应用膜材料的不同分成屏障膜组(103例)和复合组(105例)。屏障膜组术中使用屏障膜,复合组在屏障膜组基础上联合个性化钛网。了解患者牙槽骨宽度及高度变化,评定患者PES评分,同时观察并发症发生情况。结果:术后当日、6个月,两组牙槽骨宽度及高度均大于术前(P<0.05),两组术后6个月牙槽骨宽度及高度均较术后当日有所减小(P<0.05),复合组术后6个月牙槽骨宽度及高度均大于屏障膜组(P<0.05);术后3个月、6个月,两组PES评分均低于术后当日(P<0.05),两组术后6个月PES评分均较术后3个月降低(P<0.05),但复合组术后6个月PES评分高于屏障膜组(P<0.05);复合组并发症发生率(3.81%)和屏障膜组(5.83%)比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:在上前牙骨缺损患者GBR术中使用个性化钛网联合屏障膜,对骨缺损的修复效果较好,有利于提高牙龈美观效果,且安全性高。 Objective To explore the effect of personalized titanium mesh combined with barrier membrane in guided bone regeneration(GBR)repair for patients with upper anterior teeth bone defects,and its impact on the Pink Esthetic Score(PES)score.Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the data of 208 patients with alveolar bone defects in the upper anterior teeth selected by the author's hospital from December 2020 to May 2022.All patients underwent GBR surgery and were grouped into a barrier membrane group(103 cases)and a composite group(105 cases)based on the different membrane materials used during the surgery.The barrier membrane group used a barrier membrane during surgery,while the composite group used a personalized titanium mesh on the basis of the barrier membrane group.The width and height changes of the patient's alveolar bone were understood,the PES score was evaluated,and the occurrence of complications was observed.Results On the day and 6 months after surgery,the width and height of alveolar bone in both groups were greater than before surgery(P<0.05),the width and height of alveolar bone in both groups decreased at 6 months after surgery compared to the day after surgery(P<0.05),while the width and height of alveolar bone in the composite group were greater than those in the barrier membrane group at 6 months after surgery(P<0.05).At 3 and 6 months after surgery,the PES score of both groups was lower than the day after surgery(P<0.05),the PES score of both groups at 6 months after surgery was lower than that at 3 months after surgery(P<0.05),the PES score of the composite group at 6 months after surgery was higher than that of the barrier membrane group(P<0.05).There was no statistically obvious difference in the incidence of complications between the composite group(3.81%)and the barrier membrane group(5.83%)(P>0.05).Conclusion The use of personalized titanium mesh combined with barrier membrane in GBR surgery for patients with upper anterior tooth bone defects has a good repair effect on bone defects,is beneficial for improving gingival aesthetics,and has high safety.
作者 吴福雨 杨亚靖 郑娜 王娟 唐晓丽 赵彩燕 高文巧 WU Fuyu;YANG Yajing;ZHENG Na;WANG Juan;TANG Xiaoli;ZHAO Caiyan;GAO Wenqiao(Department of Stomatology No.3,Hengshui Fifth People's Hospital,Hengshui 053000,Hebei,China)
出处 《中国美容医学》 CAS 2024年第12期148-152,共5页 Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine
基金 衡水市科技计划项目(编号:2020014037Z)。
关键词 个性化钛网 屏障膜 上前牙骨缺损 引导骨再生 personalized titanium mesh barrier membrane upper anterior tooth bone defect guided bone regeneration
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献36

  • 1林野,李健慧,邱立新,邸萍,胡秀莲,王兴.口腔种植修复临床效果十年回顾研究[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2006,41(3):131-135. 被引量:152
  • 2张翔,马芸,贺平.自体骨块移植和Bio-Oss骨粉在上前牙区骨量不足种植术中的应用[J].黑龙江医学,2007,31(4):288-289. 被引量:4
  • 3Naert I,Koutsikakis G,Duyck Let al.Biologic outcome of implant-supported restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism. part I:a longitudinal clinical evaluation [J].Clin Oral Implants Res, 2002,13:381-389.
  • 4Laurito D,Lamazza L,Spink MJ,et al.Tissue-supported dental implant prosthesis (overdenture):the search for the ideal protocol A literature review [J].Ann Stomatol (Roma),2012,3 (1):2-10.
  • 5Buser D,Martin W,Belser UC.Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations [J].Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants,2004,19 (Suppl): 43 -61.
  • 6Furhauser R,Florescu D,Benesch T,et al.Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns:the pink esthetic score [J].Clin Oral Implants Res,2005,16:639-644.
  • 7Belser UC,Grutter L,Vailati F,et al.Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tuoth implants using objective esthetic criteria: a cross-sectional,retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores[J].J Periodontol,2009,80:140-151.
  • 8Fardal O,Johannessen AC,Linden GJ.Patient perceptions of periodontal therapy completed in a peliodontal practice [J].J Periodontol,2002,73:1060-1066.
  • 9Belser U,Buser D,Higginbottom F.Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding esthetics in implant dentistry[J].Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants,2004,19(Suppl):73-74.
  • 10Choquet V,Hermans M,Adriaenssens P,et al.Clinical and radiographic evaluation of the papilla level adjacent to single-tooth dental implants.A retrospective study in the maxillary anterior region [J].J Periodontol,2001,72:1364-1371.

共引文献62

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部