摘要
行政处罚追责期限(原称行政处罚追诉时效)系指超过一定期限行政执法机关对当事人的违法行为不再处罚的法律制度。这一制度虽然来自1996年《行政处罚法》第29条和2021年《行政处罚法》第36条的基本相同规定,但一直为行政法学理论和司法实践留下着广阔的讨论空间,特别是关于追责期限的计算方法。作为“小刑法”的行政处罚法基本可以套用刑法上的犯罪追诉时效理论,但依然存在差异性。特别是“违法行为纠正论”的出现和强化,几乎颠覆了传统的时效理论。立足于行政处罚法,兼评“违法行为纠正论”,全面研讨我国行政处罚追责期限制度,特别是重塑追责期限的计算方法,可望为我国行政处罚追责期限及计算方法提供一个行政法理基础。
Liability period of administrative penalty was formally known as prescriptive period of administrative penalty,it refers beyond a certain period of time,the illegal action will no longer be punished by administrative enforcement agencies.This regime derived from Article 29 of the Administrative Penalty Law of 1996,Article 36 of the Administrative Penalty Law of 2021 makes substantially the same provision.However,it has always left a wide space for discussion in administrative law theory and judicial practice,especially on the calculation method of the liability period.As a“Micro-Criminal Law”,Administrative Penalty Law can roughly apply the prescriptive period theory in criminal law,but it still exist difference.In particular,the emergence and strengthening of the“Doctrine of the Correction of Illegal Action”has almost overturned the traditional period theory.This article is based on Administrative Penalty Law,and give a complementary comment on the“Doctrine of the Correction of Illegal Action”.This article comprehensively discuss the liability period regime of administrative penalty in China,especially reshape the calculation method of liability period,try to give an administrative law jurisprudence foundation for liability period and calculation method for administrative penalty in China.
出处
《政法论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2024年第5期3-21,共19页
Tribune of Political Science and Law
基金
国家社科基金重大研究专项“以社会主义核心价值观为指导,推进国家治理法治化研究”(19YHJ006)的阶段性成果。
关键词
行政处罚
追责期限
违法状态
违法行为纠正论
Administrative Penalty
Liability Period
Unlawful Status
Doctrine of the Correction of Illegal Action
