摘要
后《巴黎协定》时代,气候司法成为各国应对气候变化的重要路径。构建气候变化行政公益诉讼,是在制度层面对环境行政公益诉讼进行更新与拓展,并最先以“决策失误型”“准入违法型”“监管失职型”三类诉因进入实践。为提供有效支撑,应在行政诉讼体系容许的范围内,结合气候问题特点进行特有规则的设计:赋予社会组织起诉资格,实行统一提级管辖与跨区域集中管辖,加强抽象行政行为的审查,建立严重性和盖然性要件的“重大风险”审查规则,增设“禁止判决”并探索气候变化补救措施。
In the post-Paris Agreement era,climate justice has become an important path for countries to address climate change.The construction of climate change administrative public interest litigation is to update and expand the environmental administrative public interest litigation at the institutional level,and firstly enter into practice with three types of counts,namely,“decision-making error”,“access violation”and“supervisory negligence”.In order to provide effective support,special rules should be designed within the scope of the administrative litigation system and taking into account the characteristics of the climate issue:giving social organizations the qualification to sue,implementing unified high-level jurisdiction and centralized cross-regional jurisdiction,strengthening the review of abstract administrative acts,establishing the review rule of“significant risk”for the elements of seriousness and cover,adding“prohibited judgment”,and exploring remedial measures for climate change.
作者
王云霞
Wang Yunxia(Law School,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan Hubei 430073,China)
出处
《河北环境工程学院学报》
CAS
2024年第4期15-22,73,共9页
Journal of Hebei University of Environmental Engineering
基金
国家哲学社会科学基金项目(21BFX132)
中南财经政法大学2024年度研究生科研创新平台项目(202410675)。
关键词
气候诉讼
预防性行政公益诉讼
气候变化风险
制度构建
climate litigation
preventive administrative public interest litigation
climate change risks
institutional construction
