期刊文献+

罪量认定的基本根据、面临问题与化解路径——以两高两部《关于办理醉酒危险驾驶刑事案件的意见》为视角 被引量:1

The Basis,Problems and Solutions of the Criminal Amount Determination-From the Perspective of the Opinions of the Supreme People's Court,the Supreme People's Procuratorate,the Ministry of Public Security,and the Ministry of Justice of Handling the Criminal Cases of Dangerous Driving while Intoxicated
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 司法机关在进行刑事立案确定罪量时,需要综合考虑影响行为社会危害性的客观因素与主观因素,做到客观主义和主观主义并重而不能失之偏颇。罪量认定是事实判断与价值判断的有机统一,行为事实是认定罪量的基础,对行为事实进行价值判断是认定罪量的保障。罪量认定面临的问题主要包括:形式上将客观因素与主观因素分别而论,导致罪量认定发生标准上的偏颇;罪量认定存在以单一或纯粹事实为根据的现象,没有揭示犯罪的本质特征;将定罪的价值判断与量刑的价值判断相混淆;不能及时适应情势变迁需要调整立案追诉标准,难以充分体现处罚必要性。化解罪量认定中的问题需要做到:罪量认定必须坚持主客观相统一,不能厚此薄彼或者此消彼长;罪量认定坚持事实判断与价值判断相结合,区分定罪情节与量刑情节;及时调整刑事立案追诉标准,确保刑事立案的公平、公正;健全和完善刑事立案监督机制。 When determining the amount of crime in the criminal case,the judicial organs need to comprehensively consider the objective and subjective factors that affect the social harm of the behavior,and pay equal attention to them.The determination of quantity of crime is the organic unity of fact judgment and value judgment.The factual behavior is the basis for determining the criminal amount,and the value judgment is the guarantee for determining the amount of crime.The main problems in the determination of the amount of crime:the formal distinction between objective factors and subjective factors,resulting in biased standards;the determination of the amount of crime is based on a single or pure fact,which does not reveal the essential characteristics of the crime;confuses the value judgment of conviction with the value judgment of sentencing;it is difficult to fully reflect the necessity of punishment if the standard of prosecution can not be adjusted in time to adapt to the changes of the situation.The solution:the determination of the amount of crime must adhere to the unity of subjective and objective,not biased;adhere to the combination of fact judgment and value judgment,distinguish between conviction and sentencing circumstances;timely adjust the standard of criminal prosecution,to ensure the fairness and justice of criminal case;improve and perfect the supervision mechanism of criminal case filing.
作者 彭文华 黄清秀 Peng Wenhua;Huang Qingxiu(Shanghai University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 201701)
机构地区 上海政法学院
出处 《警学研究》 2024年第2期5-20,共16页 Police Science Research
关键词 罪量 客观主义 主观主义 事实判断 价值判断 the amount of crime objectivism subjectivism factual judgment value judgment
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献194

共引文献384

同被引文献13

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部