摘要
现有语言学知识分类体系的规训路径主要是教育制度、图书分类、项目管理、概论教材和学术期刊。中国语言学要真正打开对于语言学的想象,不断创造出新的理论范式,就需要跳出这一“格式化”,重新思考“何为语言”,进而提出对“语言”的各种不同假设。由此,认识、发现并创造出一系列语言学研究范式:“基于语言符号体系假设的语言学”“基于社会制度假设的语言学”“基于行为过程假设的语言学”“基于神经机能假设的语言学”“基于数字过程假设的语言学”“基于活动能力假设的语言学”等。这是“目标—问题—方法”彼此既有联系又相当不同的研究范式,这些范式之间并非“本体”与“应用”或“中心”与“边缘”的关系,它们彼此嵌入、彼此支持而又彼此竞争。
The existing linguistic knowledge classification system has been developed mainly based on education,book classification,project management,introductionary textbooks and academic journals.If Chinese linguistics is to truly open up the imagination of linguistics and continuously create new theoretical paradigms,it is necessary to jump out of this“formatting”,rethink“what is language”and then put forward different assumptions about“language”.In this way,a series of linguistic research paradigms can be recognised,discovered and created:“Linguistics based on the assumption of linguistic symbol system”,“Linguistics based on the assumption of the social system”,“Linguistics based on the assumption of the behavioural process”,“Linguistics based on the assumption of the neural functions”,“Linguistics based on the assumption of the numerical process”,“Linguistics based on the assumption of activity competence”,etc.These are“goal-problem-methodology”research paradigms that are both related to each other and quite different from each other,and these paradigms are not“ontological”and“applied”or“central”and“peripheral”,but rather embedded in,supportive of,and in competition with each other.
作者
胡范铸
胡亦名
HU Fanzhu;HU Yiming(Chinese Language and Culture College of Huaqiao University,Xiamen 361021,China;Hujiang College,University of Shanghai for Science and Technology,Shanghai 201105,China;Centre for National Discourse Ecology Studies,East China Normal University,Shanghai 201112,China)
出处
《外国语》
CSSCI
北大核心
2024年第2期10-18,73,共10页
Journal of Foreign Languages
基金
国家社科基金重点项目“以‘新言语行为分析’为核心的汉语修辞学理论研究”(19AYY002)。
关键词
语言学体系
知识规训
语言学概论
语言制度
数字语言学
语言能力
言语行为
linguistic systems
knowledge regulation
introduction to linguistics
linguistic institutionalism
digital linguistics
linguistic competence
speech behaviour