摘要
目的比较不同填充材料在牙体牙髓病患儿根管治疗中的应用效果。方法选取2020年1月至2021年12月于济宁市任城区妇幼保健院行根管治疗的牙体牙髓病患儿126例(患牙200颗),按照随机数字表法分为三组。无极三氧化矿物凝聚体(MTA)组(42例,患牙67颗)采用MTA封闭剂,Viapex组(42例,患牙66颗)采用Viapex封闭剂,Cortisomol组(42例,患牙67颗)采用Cortisomol封闭剂。比较三组术后疼痛情况及临床疗效。结果术后3、7 d,MTA组数字评分法(NRS)评分均低于其余两组,Viapex组NRS评分低于Cortisomol组(P<0.05)。MTA组总有效率高于Cortisomol组(P<0.05)。结论MTA和Viapex封闭剂在牙体牙髓病患儿根管治疗中的应用效果较好,其中MTA在减轻患儿术后疼痛方面更具优势。
Objective To compare the application effect of different filling materials in root canal treatment of children with endodontic disease.Methods A total of 126 children with endodontic disease(200 affected teeth)who received root canal treatment in Rencheng District Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Jining City from January 2020 to December 2021 were selected and divided into three groups according to random number table method.The mineraltrioxideaggregate(MTA)group(42 cases with 67 affected teeth)was given MTA sealer,the Viapex group(42 cases with 66 affected teeth)was given Viapex sealer,and the Cortisomol group(42 cases with 67 affected teeth)was given Cortisomol sealer.The postoperative pain and clinical effect of the three groups were compared.Results At 3 and 7 days after surgery,numerical rating scale(NRS)score of MTA group was lower than that of other two groups,NRS score of Viapex group was lower than that of Cortisomol group(P<0.05).The total effective rate of MTA group was higher than that of Cortisomol group(P<0.05).Conclusion The application of MTA and Viapex sealer in root canal treatment of children with endodontic disease is better,and MTA is more effective in reducing postoperative pain in children.
作者
张明华
ZHANG Minghua(Department of Stomatology,Rencheng District Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Jining City,Shandong Province,Jining 272005,China)
出处
《妇儿健康导刊》
2024年第3期58-60,67,共4页
JOURNAL OF WOMEN AND CHILDREN'S HEALTH GUIDE
关键词
牙体牙髓病
根管治疗
填充材料
术后疼痛
Endodontic disease
Root canal treatment
Filling material
Pos toperative pain
