摘要
非善意的合同相对人与公司法定代表人越权签订担保合同的,其行为目的在于利用信息不对称的优势实施转移债务的“机会主义”行为。而现行司法判定规则会基于缔约过失责任原理,考察被越权签订担保合同公司的过错而判定其赔偿责任。而相对人非善意的,越权担保合同效力不存在应然性的法理基础。公司对于越权担保合同的签订难以被认为是一种过错,不应当承担缔约过失责任。相对人非善意的情形应当适用无权代理规则,越权担保合同效力应视公司的追认而定;公司拒绝追认的,被越权签订的担保合同不发生效力,且公司也无须承担债务责任。
If the non-bona fide counterpart of the contract and the legal representative of the company sign a guarantee contract in excess of his powers,the purpose of the act is to use the advantage of information asymmetry to carry out the opportunistic behavior of debt transfer.However,based on the principle of liability for contracting negligence,the current judicial judgment rules will investigate the fault of the company that has signed a guaran-tee contract in excess of authority,and then judge its liability for compensation.While in the case when the signing of the guarantee contract is not the true intention of the company,there is no legal basis for the validity of the ultravires guarantee contract.It is difficult for a company to consider the act of signing a guarantee contract in excess of its authority as a fault,and it should not be investigated for its fault in contracting.If the counterpart is not in good faith,the rule of unauthorized agency should be applied,and the effectiveness of the ultravires guarantee contract should be determined by the recognition of the company's legal representative.If the company refuses to ratify,the guarantee contract signed in excess of its authority shall not become effective,and the company shall not be liable for debts that cannot be repaid.
作者
宋戈
SONG Ge(School of Law and Social Work,Dongguan Institute of Technology(Intellectual Property College),Dongguan 523106,China)
出处
《沿海企业与科技》
2023年第5期24-29,共6页
Coastal Enterprises and Science & Technology
关键词
担保
合同
非善意
过错
信赖
guarantee
contract
non-bona fide
fault
reliance
