期刊文献+

评估下颌第三磨牙拔除难度分类方法的概述 被引量:5

Review of classification methods for evaluating the difficulty of mandibular third molar extraction
暂未订购
导出
摘要 为了选择合适的拔除方法,一般通过口内检查辅以影像学检查来评估下颌第三磨牙位置关系及拔除难度。目前在临床上应用广泛的下颌第三磨牙分类主要有Winter分类和Pell-Gregory分类,但有研究表明评估结果和实际偏差较大,临床适用性不强。因此,学者们以此为基础,结合下颌第三磨牙的解剖学特点,进行更细化的分类,提出了如Pederson指数、综合阻生指数、Juodzbalys和Daugela分类法等。本文对评估下颌第三磨牙拔除难度的分类方法进行概述,为更安全高效地拔除下颌第三磨牙提供参考依据。 To select an appropriate extraction method,the position relationship and extraction difficulty of mandibular third molars are generally evaluated by intraoral examination and imaging examination.Now,the classification of mandibular third molars widely used in clinical practice mainly includes Winter classification and Pell-Gregory classification.Therefore some studies show that the evaluation results have a large deviation from the actual situation,and the clinical applicability is not strong.On this basis,the scholars combined with the anatomical characteristics of the mandibular third molar to make a more detailed classification,and proposed classification methods such as Pederson Index,Comprehensive Impacted Index,Juodzbalys and Daugela.This article summarizes the classification methods for evaluating the difficulty of mandibular third molar extraction,and provides a reference for safer and more efficient extraction of mandibular third molars.
作者 柴安 雷荣昌 蒋智升 曲彬彬 郭锦材 李鹤 邵奇 Chai An;Lei Rongchang;Jiang Zhisheng;Qu Binbin;Guo Jincai;Li He;Shao Qi(Dept.of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery,The Affiliated Stomatological Hospital,Hunan University of Chinese Medicine,Changsha 410208,China;Dept.of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery,Changsha Stomatological Hospital,Changsha 410006,China;Dept.of Pharmacy,Changsha Stomatological Hospital,Changsha 410006,China)
出处 《国际口腔医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2023年第6期718-722,共5页 International Journal of Stomatology
关键词 下颌第三磨牙 拔除难度 分类方法 预测模型 mandibular third molars difficulty of removal classification method forecast model
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献44

  • 1Haug RH, Perrott DH, Gonzalez ML, et al. The American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons age-related third molar study [J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2005, 63(8): 1106-1 114.
  • 2Gelesko S, Blakey GH, Partrick M, et al. Comparison of periodontal inflammatory disease in young adults with and without pericoronitis involving mandibular third molars [J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2009, 67(1): 134-139.
  • 3Blondeau F, Daniel NG. Extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: postoperative complications and their risk factors [J]. J Can Dent Assoc, 2007, 73(4): 325.
  • 4Rood JP. Permanent damage to inferior alveolar and lingual nerves during the removal of impacted mandibular third molars. Comparison of two methods of bone removal [J]. Br dent J, 1992, 172(3): 108-110.
  • 5Sisk AL, Hammer WB, Shelton DW, et al. Complications following removal of impacted third molars: the role of the experience of the surgeon[J]. J Oral maxillofac Surg,1986, 44(11): 855-859.
  • 6Blaeser BF, August MA, Donoff RB, et al. Panoramic radiographic risk factors for inferior alveolar nerve injury "after third molai" extraction [J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2003, 61 (4): 417-421.
  • 7Wofford DT, Miller RI. Prospective study of dysesthesia following odontectomy of impacted mandibular third molars [J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1987, 45(1): 15-19.
  • 8Nakagawa Y, Ishii H, Nomura Y, et al. Third molar position: reliability of panoramic radiography [J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2007, 65(7): 1303-1308.
  • 9Valmaseda-Castellon E, Berini-Aytrs L, Gay-Escoda C. Inferior alveolar nerve damage after lower third molar surgical extraction: a prospective study of 1117 surgical extractions [J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2001, 92(4): 377-383.
  • 10Jerjes W, Swinson B, Moles DR, et al. Permanent sensory nerve impairment following thit,d molar surgery: a prospective study [J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod,2006,102(4): e1-7.

共引文献74

同被引文献52

引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部