摘要
智慧司法生态设计的目的之一是为了减轻法官群体的非诉讼任务,但同时在法官责任终身制的背景下,智慧司法制度极易成为该群体“去责任化”的“避风港”。智慧司法平台的应用,使得司法决策者的决策方式发生显著变化,导致司法责任的认定程序及结果也随之发生改变。从“卢米斯案”来看,针对数字技术在司法领域的应用,多是关注算法风险及程序正义等问题,忽略了数字技术对现有司法责任伦理的冲击。司法活动的数字技术应用将导致司法责任规避的法理复杂化和多元化,极易在司法系统内形成“数字避风港”的倾向。因此,在拥抱数字技术的同时也应当看到其对司法责任伦理的冲击,构建起数字时代的司法责任体系才是完善智慧司法生态制度的应有之义。
One of the purposes of intelligent judicial ecology design is to reduce the non-litigation tasks of the judge community,but at the same time,in the context of the lifelong system of judge responsibility,intelligent justice can easily become their“safe haven”of“de-accountability”.The application of intelligent judicial platform makes the decision-making mode of the judiciary change significantly,which leads to the change in the accreditation procedure and result of judicial responsibility.As fra as“Loomis case”is concerned,the application of digital technology in the judicial field is focused on the algorithmic risk and procedural justice,while ignoring the impact of digital technology on the existent judicial responsibility ethics.The application of digital technology in judicial activities will lead to the complex and pluralistic legal principle of judicial responsibility evasion,apt to form the tendency of“digital haven”within the judicial system.Therefore,while embracing the digital technology,we should also see its impact on the judicial responsibility ethics.It is necessary to construct the judicial responsibility system in the digital age to improve the intelligent justice ecology system.
作者
曹重阳
叶晓川
CAO Chong-yang;YE Xiao-chuan(Law School,People's Public Security Universiy of China,Bejing 100038,China)
出处
《太原理工大学学报（社会科学版）》
2023年第4期81-88,共8页
Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology(Social Science Edition)
基金
中国人民公安大学委托研究专项课题“习近平法治思想专题研究”(2022FZSX01)。
关键词
智慧司法
人工智能
司法责任
责任推诿
技术伦理
intelligent justice
artificial intelligence
judicial responsibility
buck passing
technical ethics
