摘要
混合担保人之间是否享有追偿权一直争议不断,理论上形成了追偿论和无追偿权论两种观点。体系融贯视角下,混合担保无追偿权论具有妥适性。追偿论中代位求偿论与连带责任论存在强行推定共同担保意思的瑕疵。混合担保规则在逻辑体系上的融贯性体现为:该规则使数人担保责任形成了共同担保、混合担保、按份担保三足鼎立的局面;在数人责任体系中,混合担保规则外部呈现连带关系,内部无追偿权,从而区别于其他数人责任类型;混合担保规则与原因力竞合的无意思联络数人侵权的区别在于立法目的不同,前者体现对意思自治的维护,后者体现对侵权行为的制裁。从价值体系融贯性角度而言,混合担保规则与平等原则无关,以意思自治原则为核心价值遵循,兼顾效率与公平,可实现价值之间的体系融贯。
There has been continuous controversy over whether mixed guarantors have the right to recovery,and theoretically there are two views,the theory of recovery and the theory of no recovery.From the perspective of system integration,the theory of mixed guarantee without recourse is appropriate.The subrogation theory and the joint and several liability theory in the recovery theory have the defects of presuming the intention of joint guarantee by force.The integration of mixed guarantee rules in the logical system is reflected in the following:this rule forms a tripartite balance of joint guarantee,mixed guarantee,and partial guarantee for the liability of several persons.It stands in an independent position within the multi person liability system,with external joint and several relationships and no internal right of recovery.The difference between it and the unintentional contact infringement of multiple persons with conflicting causes lies in the different legislative purposes.The former reflects the maintenance of autonomy of will,while the latter reflects the sanctions for infringement.From the perspective of value system coherence,the mixed guarantee rule is unrelated to the principle of equality,and follows the principle of autonomy of will as the core value,balancing efficiency and fairness,and achieving system coherence between values.
作者
汤敏
Tang Min(Nanjing University of Science and Technology,School of Intellectual Property,Nanjing Jiangsu 210094,China)
出处
《内蒙古社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2023年第3期122-132,共11页
Inner Mongolia Social Sciences
基金
南京理工大学自主科研专项计划项目“碳汇作为生态环境损害责任替代修复承担方式研究”(编号:30922011212)。
关键词
混合担保
无追偿权
意思自治
体系融贯
Mixed Guarantee
No Right of Recovery
Autonomy of Will
System Integration
