摘要
侵犯注册商标犯罪案件数量在知识产权刑事案件中占绝对比例,在实践态势上呈现出诸多新情况和新特点。《刑法修正案(十一)》对该类犯罪修改后,由于配套司法解释一直尚未出台,导致司法实务界在具体适用时“无据可依”。建议参照“同一种商品”的规定,对“同一种服务”及其相关认定规则进行明确。在保持追诉起点不变的基础上,对《中华人民共和国刑法》(以下简称《刑法》)第213条和第215条“情节严重”的情形进行扩充和完善,对《刑法》第214条的“其他严重情节”进一步细化。按照“获利说”的观点,对“违法所得数额”进行界定,在取证以及计算数额时,重点把握“直接用于经营活动的必要支出”这一关键要素进行界定。
The number of criminal cases of infringement of registered trademarks accounts for an absolute proportion of criminal cases of intellectual property rights,which presents many new situations and characteristics in practice.After the amendment to Criminal Law(XI)has been amended to this kind of crime,the judicial practice circle has no evidence to rely on because the supporting judicial interpretation has not been issued yet.It is suggested to refer to the provisions of“one kind of commodity”to clarify“one kind of service”and its related identification rules.It is suggested that on the basis of keeping the same starting point of prosecution,the“serious circumstances”in Article 213 and Article 215 of criminal Law should be expanded and improved,and the“other serious circumstances”in Article 214 of Criminal Law should be further refined.It is suggested that the amount of illegal income should be defined according to the view of“profit theory”.When obtaining evidence and calculating the amount,the key element of“necessary expenditure directly used in business activities”should be defined.
作者
天津市人民检察院第二分院课题组
Research Group of the Second Branch of Tianjin People's Procuratorate(The Second Branch of Tianjin People's Procuratorate,Tianjin 300210,China)
出处
《天津法学》
2022年第3期72-80,共9页
Tianjin Legal Science
基金
2021年度天津市人民检察院重点研究课题“办理侵犯知识产权刑事案件法律适用问题研究”阶段性成果,项目编号:21TJJY0501。
关键词
服务商标
入罪数额标准
其他严重情节
违法所得数额
service trademark
standard of incriminating amount
other serious circumstances
amount of illegal gains
