期刊文献+

“双减”背景下中小学教师评价机制构建

Construction of Evaluation Mechanism for Primary and Secondary School Teachers under the Background of“Double Reduction”
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 落实“双减”政策需构建与之契合的中小学教师评价机制。“双减”背景下,中小学教师评价存在评价目的模糊、评价主体单一、评价指标繁琐、结果应用粗浅的现实困境。围绕“双减”意见要求,全面提升教育教学和课后服务质量,应构建合理的中小学教师评价机制,该机制应:确立正确的评价取向,促进教师专业发展;强化教师评价主体性,建立多元化评价方式;紧扣教师评价目标,构建简洁高效指标体系;提升评价应用水平,促进教育教学提质增效。 To implement the“Double Reduction”policy,it is necessary to construct a corresponding evaluation mechanism for primary and secondary school teachers.Under the background of“Double Reduction”policy,the evaluation of primary and secondary school teachers has realistic difficultiessuch as vagueevaluation purpose,single evaluation subject,cumbersome evaluation index and superficial application of results.Under the guidance of the“Double Reduction”suggestion that schools should comprehensively improve the quality of education,teaching and after-school services,we should construct a scientific and reasonable evaluation mechanism for primary and secondary school teachers,which establishes a correct evaluation orientation,promotes teachers’professional development,strengthens the subjectivity of teacher evaluation,establishes a diversified evaluation method,closely linked to teacher evaluation objectives,builds a simple and efficient index system,improves the application level of evaluation and promotes the quality and efficiency of education and teaching.
作者 刘梅 LIU Mei(Department of Education,Cangzhou Normal University,Cangzhou,Hebei 061001,China)
出处 《沧州师范学院学报》 2022年第4期107-110,共4页 Journal of Cangzhou Normal University
基金 2021年度河北省教育科学“十四五”规划课题“‘双减’背景下中小学教师评价机制构建研究”,编号:No.2102045 2022年度沧州市社会科学发展研究课题“‘双减’政策下中小学教师评价存在的问题及对策研究”,编号:No.2022045。
关键词 “双减” 中小学教师评价 教师评价机制 “Double Reduction”policy primary and secondary school teacher evaluation mechanism of teachers'appraisal
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献55

  • 1蔡永红,林崇德.教师绩效评价的理论与实践[J].教师教育研究,2005,17(1):36-41. 被引量:109
  • 2张华,刘万海.当前学生评价中亟待澄清的几个问题[J].全球教育展望,2005,34(10):40-44. 被引量:14
  • 3Rivkin S. G., E. A. Hanushek, and J. F. Kain. Teachers, schools, and academic achievement [ J l- Econometrica, 2005, 73 (2) : 417 -458.
  • 4University of Tennessee Value-Added Research and Assess- ment Center. Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement [ R]. Knoxville, TN, 1996.
  • 5Sanders W. L., S. P. Wright, and S. P. Horn. Teach- er and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation [ J ]. Journal of Per- sonnel Evaluation in Education, 1997, 11 (1) : 57 -67.
  • 6Jason Millman. Grading teachers, grading schools : Is student achievement a valid evaluation measure [M]. Cor- win Press Ine, 1997.
  • 7Sanders, W. L. and S. P. Horn. The Tennessee value- added assessment system (TVAAS) : Mixed-model meth- odology in educational assessment [ J]. Journal of Person- nel Evaluation in Education, 1994, 8 (3) : 299 - 311.
  • 8Martineau J. A. Distorting value added: The use of longi- tudinal, vertically scaled student achievement data for growth-based, value-added accountability [ J ]. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2006, 31 ( 1 ) : 35 -62.
  • 9Sass T. R., A. Semykina, and D. N. Harris. Value- added models and the measurement of teacher productivity [ J ]. Economics of Education Review, 2014, 38 : 9 - 23.
  • 10Mariano L. T., D. F. McCaffrey, and J. Lockwood. A model for teacher effects from longitudinal data without as- suming vertical scaling [ J ]. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2010, 35 (3) : 253 - 279.

共引文献107

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部