期刊文献+

前列腺癌药物临床试验老年受试者样本代表性分析 被引量:1

Representative analysis of elderly subjects in clinical trials of prostate cancer drugs
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的分析前列腺癌药物临床试验老年受试者样本是否具有代表性。方法从试验设计层面上,查询药物临床试验登记和信息公示平台上公示的2019年1月至2021年12月针对以老年患者为主的前列腺癌药物临床试验对受试者年龄的规定;从实际入组层面上,收集某医院自2010年1月至2022年6月立项并完成受试者入组的前列腺癌药物临床试验,已出具总结报告的多中心试验采集全部中心的受试者年龄信息,未出具总结报告的或单中心试验采集本中心受试者年龄数据与中国肿瘤登记系统中前列腺癌平均发病年龄、分年龄段发病率进行比较,比较二者是否一致。结果绝大多数(72.1%、44/61)临床试验在方案设计层面上未设置年龄上限,Ⅲ期、Ⅳ期试验均未在方案中设置入组受试者年龄上限。从实际入组层面,本研究共纳入19项药物临床试验,1402例受试者,受试者年龄60~93(67.1±8.6)岁,与全国及北京市前列腺癌发病平均年龄差异有统计学意义(均P<0.001),入组人数最多的年龄段为60~64岁(34.2%、479/1402)、≥75岁最少(21.5%、301/1402),年龄分布与2017年中国前列腺癌高发年龄段≥75岁(421.77/10万)不同。结论前列腺癌药物临床试验在设计方面涵盖全年龄段老年患者,但实际入组的老年受试者样本代表性不足,在保护受试者安全的前提下,与前列腺癌平均发病年龄、分年龄段发病率相匹配的受试人群应该逐步提升。 Objective To analyze whether the sample of elderly subjects in clinical trials of prostate cancer drugs is representative.Methods From the level of trial design,the age distribution of subjects in clinical trials of prostate cancer drugs for elderly patients from January 2019 to December 2021 was inquired on the platform of drug clinical trial registration and information disclosure.From the actual enrollment level,the prostate cancer drug clinical trials initiated and completed by a hospital from January 2010 to June 2022 were collected.The age information of subjects in all centers was collected for multicenter trials with a summary report,and the age data of subjects in the center was collected for trials without a summary report or single-center trials.The average age of prostate cancer onset and the incidence of prostate cancer in different age groups were compared with the Chinese Cancer Registry System,so as to compare whether the two were consistent.Results Most of the trials(72.1%、44/61)did not set upper age limit at the protocol design level.PhaseⅢand phaseⅣtrials did not set an upper age limit for enrolled subjects in the protocol.From the actual enrollment level,a total of 19 studies were included in this study,with 1402 subjects,and the average age of subjects was 67.1±8.6 years old,which was significantly different from the average age of prostate cancer in China and Beijing(all P<0.001).The age group with the largest number of participants was 60-64 years old(34.2%、479/1402).The population aged≥75 years was the least(21.5%,301/1402),which was different from the high incidence age group of prostate cancer in China in 2017(421.77/100000).Conclusions Clinical trials of prostate cancer drugs are designed to cover all age groups of elderly patients,but the actual sample representation of the enrolled elderly subjects is insufficient.Under the premise of protecting the safety of subjects,the trial population who are matched for the average age of prostate cancer onset and the incidence of prostate cancer in age groups,should be gradually increased.
作者 姚慧卿 赵海娟 苗苗 王情情 刘飞 赵朗 刘瑶 张莹 王欣 Yao Huiqing;Zhao Haijuan;Miao Miao;Wang Qingqing;Liu Fei;Zhao Lang;Liu Yao;Zhang Ying;Wang Xin(Clinical Trial Center,Beijing Hospital,National Center of Gerontology Institute of Geriatric Medicine,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,Beijing 100730,China)
出处 《中华老年医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2022年第10期1197-1201,共5页 Chinese Journal of Geriatrics
基金 首都卫生科研发展专项(2022-2Z-4055) 中国医学科学院医学与健康科技创新工程(2021-I2M-1-045) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(3332021080)。
关键词 前列腺肿瘤 药物 临床试用 发病年龄 Prostatic neoplasms Drugs,investigational Age of onset
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献52

  • 1钱小顺,侯允天,薛桥,韩亚玲,刘雪红,刘建立,王士雯.1605例老年多器官功能衰竭的临床分析[J].中华老年多器官疾病杂志,2002,1(1):7-10. 被引量:126
  • 2艾尔肯,秦永志.论医疗知情同意书——兼评《侵权责任法》第55条、第56条的规定[J].东方法学,2010(3):109-115. 被引量:23
  • 3季闽春,耿晓芳,郑松柏.老年药理学[M]//郑松柏,朱汉民主编.老年医学概论.上海:复旦大学出版社,2010:41-54.
  • 4Almirall J,Vaqueiro M, Ant6n E, et al. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in community-dwelling elderly and associated cardiovascular risk factors. Nefrologia, 2005, 25: 655-662.
  • 5Li ZM, Wang LX, Jiang LC, et al. Relationship between plasma cortisol levels and stress ulcer following acute and severe head injury. Med Prine Pract, 2010,19~17-21.
  • 6Farrell CP, Mercogliano G, Kuntz CL. Overuse o{ stress ulcer prophylaxis in the critical care setting and beyond. Journal o{ Critical Care, 2010, 25.. 214-220.
  • 7Tamblyn R. Medication use in seniors: challenges and solutions. Therapie, 1996, 51: 269-282.
  • 8王秋梅,康琳,译.合理的处方,药物相互作用和不良反应∥谢海雁,沈悌.老年病综合评估与速查手册.北京:中国协和医科大学出版社,2010:12-22.
  • 9Ozttirk A, Simsek TT, Yiimin ET, et al. The relationship between physical, {unctional capacity and quality of life (QoL) among elderly people with a chronic disease. Archives of Gerontoogy and Geriatrics, 2011, 3: 278-283.
  • 10齐海宇,阴赪宏,王超,苏强,张淑文,王宝恩.老年多器官功能障碍综合征的死亡因素分析[J].中国急救医学,2007,27(11):967-970. 被引量:14

共引文献313

同被引文献16

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部