期刊文献+

基于Altmetrics的科研机构影响力综合评价研究 被引量:5

Research on Comprehensive Impact Evaluation of Scientific Research Institutions Based on Altmetrics
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的/意义]分析Altmetrics在科研机构评价方面的应用,以进一步完善科研机构评价体系。[方法/过程]从科研机构的论文产出影响力、机构社会影响力和机构合作影响力三个方面构建科研机构的影响力综合评价指标体系,并选择我国图书情报领域核心期刊2016—2020年发文量Top 30的机构进行实证分析。[结果/结论]Altmetrics指标和文献计量指标起主要作用,合作计量指标的影响相对较小,Altmetrics指标用于科研机构进行评价具有一定的可行性。 [Purpose/significance] The paper is to analyze the application of Altmetrics in the evaluation of scientific research institution to further improve the evaluation system of scientific research institution. [Method/process] The paper constructs the comprehensive evaluation index system of the influence of scientific research institution from three aspects: the paper output influence,the social influence of institutions and the cooperation influence of institutions,and conducts an empirical analysis on the top 30 institutions in the core journals of library and information field in China from 2016 to 2020. [Result/conclusion] Altmetrics index and bibliometric index play a major role,while the influence of cooperative index is relatively small. Altmetrics index has certain feasibility in the evaluation of scientific research institutions.
作者 贾玉文 牛铭渝 Jia Yuwen;Niu Mingyu(School of Government,Liaoning Normal University,Dalian Liaoning 116000)
出处 《情报探索》 2022年第9期71-76,共6页 Information Research
关键词 学术评价 科研机构 Altmetrics 社会影响力 academic evaluation scientific research institution Altmetrics social influence
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献198

  • 1龚旭.同行评议公正性的影响因素分析[J].科学学研究,2004,22(6):613-618. 被引量:70
  • 2赵波,张志强,郑军卫.从科学文献计量看中国国际地球科学研究队伍现状与科研影响力[J].地球科学进展,2005,20(12):1371-1375. 被引量:5
  • 3科技革命与中国的现代化-关于中国面向2050年科技发展战略的思考[M].北京:科学出版社,2009.
  • 4Campbell, D.F.J. The Evaluation of University Research in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands, Germany and Austria. In P. Shapira, S. Kuhhnann (eds) Learning from Science and Technology Policy Evaluation [ M ]. Edward Elgar, 2003.98-131.
  • 5Lyall, C., Bruce, A., Firn, J., Firn, M. and tait, J. Assessing end-use relevance of public sector research organizations [J]. Research Policy, 2004,33 ( 1 ):73-87.
  • 6Jordan, G.B. and Streit, D. Recognizing the Competing Values in Science and Technology Organization: Implications for Evaluation. In P. Shapira, S. Kuhlmann (eds) Learning from Science and Technology Policy Evaluation [M]. Edward Elgar, 2003.316-338.
  • 7Checkland, P.B. Towards a system-based methodology for real-word problem solving [J]. Journal of System Engineering, 1972, (3):87-116.
  • 8Jacobs, B. Using soft systems methodology for performance improvement and organizational change in the English national health service [J]. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 2004,12(4):138-149.
  • 9Shapira, P. and S. Kuhlmann (eds). Learning from Science and Technology Policy Evaluation [M]. Edward Elgar, 2003.
  • 10International Institute for Management Development. World Competitiveness Yearbook [R]. Lausanne, 2004.

共引文献278

同被引文献68

引证文献5

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部