摘要
目的评估乳腺癌患者信息需求评估工具的信效度,为乳腺癌患者推荐合适的信息需求评估量表。方法计算机检索PubMed、Embase、PsycINFO、EBSCOhost、WOS核心合集、中国知网、万方数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库中发表的关于乳腺癌患者信息需求评估量表的研究。纳入标准包括研究内容为乳腺癌患者信息需求量表/肿瘤患者信息需求量表且原始研究样本中包含乳腺癌患者;结局指标包括信度、效度评估。排除标准包括乳腺癌患者家属/照顾者信息需求评估,未满足信息需求评估,语种为非中英文,评论、综述、质性研究、系统评价、Meta分析。采用COSMIN评价手册中测量特征评价标准对量表的测量特征进行评价。结果共检索出1293篇文献,最终纳入13篇文献。13个量表均无结构效度的假设检验、跨文化效度、效标效度及反应性指标。11个量表为B级推荐,2个为C级推荐。结合方法学质量评价结果与测量特征评价结果、研发人群与使用人群的一致性,癌症患者心理需求评估量表及CNAT为最优量表。结论根据COSMIN指南标准,目前尚无可供推荐的量表,而综合方法学质量、测量特征的评价结果、研发人群与使用人群的一致性,癌症患者心理需求评估量表和CNAT为最优的量表。
Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of the information needs assessment scales for breast cancer patients,so as to recommend an appropriate information needs assessment scale for breast cancer patients.Methods Researches on the information needs assessment tools for breast cancer patients were retrieved by computer in PubMed,Embase,PsycINFO,EBSCOhost,WOS Core Collection,China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI),WanFang Data,and China Biomedical Literature Database.The inclusion criteria included that the research content was the breast cancer patient information needs scale/tumor patient information needs scale and the original research sample included breast cancer patients,and outcome indicators included reliability and validity.Exclusion criteria included assessment of information needs of family members/caregivers of breast cancer patients,assessment of unmet information needs,languages other than Chinese and English,comments,reviews,qualitative studies,systematic reviews,and Meta-analyses.The measurement characteristics of the scale were evaluated using the measurement characteristics evaluation criteria in the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments(COSMIN)evaluation manual.Results A total of 1293 articles were retrieved,and 13 articles were finally included.The 13 scales had no hypothesis test of construct validity,cross-cultural validity,criterion validity and reactivity index.11 of the scales were recommended as Grade B,and 2 were recommended as Grade C.Combined with the methodological quality evaluation results and measurement characteristics evaluation results,and the consistency between the research and development population and the user population,the Psychological Needs of Cancer Patient Scale and the Comprehensive Needs Assessment Tool in cancer(CNAT)are the optimal scales.Conclusions There are currently no recommended scales according to the COSMIN guidelines.Considering the methodological quality,the evaluation results of measurement characteristics,and the consistency between the research and development population and the user population,the Psychological Needs of Cancer Patient Scale and the CNAT are the optimal scales.
作者
刘丽香
张春华
黎轶丽
阳佩
陈小杭
刘茜茜
饶翮
Liu Lixiang;Zhang Chunhua;Li Yili;Yang Pei;Chen Xiaohang;Liu Qianqian;Rao He(Department of Oncology Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy,Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University,Wuhan 430000,China;Nursing Department,Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University,Wuhan 430000,China;Department of Thyroid Breast Oncology,Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University,Wuhan 430000,China)
出处
《中华现代护理杂志》
2022年第21期2817-2823,共7页
Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
关键词
乳腺肿瘤
需求评估
量表
Breast neoplasms
Needs assessment
Scale
