期刊文献+

高位退变性腰椎滑脱斜外侧腰椎间融合椎弓钉固定 被引量:1

Oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with pedicle screw fixation for upper degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis
原文传递
导出
摘要 [目的]评价斜外侧腰椎间融合术(oblique lumbar interbody fusion,OLIF)联合Wiltse入路椎弓根钉固定治疗高位退变性腰椎滑脱症的临床疗效。[方法]回顾性分析2018年3月—2019年6月本院手术治疗的高位退变性腰椎滑脱症43例患者的临床资料。根据医患沟通结果,20例采用OLIF联合Wiltse入路椎弓根钉固定治疗(OLIF组),23例采用经椎间孔腰椎间融合术(transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion,TLIF)(TLIF组)治疗。比较两组围手术期、随访及影像资料。[结果]所有患者均顺利完成手术,OLIF组在手术时间、切口长度、术中失血量、术后引流量、下地行走时间和术后住院时间上均显著优于TLIF组(P<0.05)。所有患者均获随访12个月以上,平均随访(22.70±6.51)个月。OLIF组完全负重活动时间显著早于TLIF组(P<0.05)。随时间推移,两组VAS、ODI评分均显著减少(P<0.05),而JOA评分显著增加(P<0.05)。相应时间点,两组间VAS、ODI及JOA评分的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。影像方面,与术前相比,末次随访时两组患者椎间隙高度、椎间孔高度、腰椎前凸角均显著增加(P<0.05);而椎体滑脱率均明显减少(P<0.05)。术后3、6个月和末次随访时,OLIF组Lenke椎间融合评级均显著优于TLIF组(P<0.05)。[结论]相较于TLIF术,OLIF联合Wiltse入路椎弓根钉固定治疗高位退变性腰椎滑脱症具有医源性创伤小、恢复快、术后并发症少等优点。 [Objective]To evaluate the clinical outcomes of oblique lumbar interbody fusion(OLIF)combined with pedicle screw fixation through Wiltse approach for upper degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.[Methods]A retrospective study was done on 43 patients who received surgical treatment for upper degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis in our hospital from March 2018 to June 2019.Based on preoperative doctor-patient communication,20 patients were treated with OLIF combined with pedicle screw fixation through Wiltse approach(the OLIF group),while the other 23 patients underwent transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(the TLIF group).The perioperative,follow-up and imaging data of the two groups were compared.[Results]All patients had operation finished successfully,with the OLIF group significantly superior to the TLIF group in terms of operation time,incision length,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative drainage,postoperative walking time and hospital stay(P<0.05).All patients were followed up for more than 12 months,with a mean of(22.70±6.51)months.The OLIF group resumed full weight-bearing activity significantly earlier than the TLIF group(P<0.05).The VAS and ODI scores decreased significantly(P<0.05),while JOA score increased significantly in both groups over time(P<0.05).At any corresponding time points,no significant differences in VAS,ODI and JOA scores were noticed between the two groups(P<0.05).Radiographically,intervertebral space height,intervertebral foraminal height,and lumbar lordosis angle significantly increased(P<0.05),whereas the slippage degree of vertebral body decreased significantly in both groups at the latest follow-up compared with those preoperatively(P<0.05).The OLIF group proved significantly superior to the TLIF group in term of Lenke interbody fusion scale at 3 months,6 months and the latest follow-up(P<0.05).[Conclusion]OLIF combined with pedicle screw fixation through Wiltse approach has advantages of minimizing iatrogenic trauma,enhancing recovery and reducing postoperative complications over the TLIF for treatment of upper degenerative spondylolisthesis.
作者 铁伟宾 牛辉 刘宏建 TIE Wei-bin;NIU Hui;LIU Hongjian(Department of Orthopaedics,Luoyang Orthopaedic Hospital,uoyang 450016 China;Department of Orthopaedics,The First Affiliated Hospital Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450052 China)
出处 《中国矫形外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2022年第13期1174-1179,共6页 Orthopedic Journal of China
关键词 腰椎滑脱 斜外侧腰椎间融合术 Wiltse入路 椎弓根钉 经椎间孔腰椎间融合术 lumbar spondylolisthesis oblique lumbar interbody fusion Wiltse approach pedicle screw transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献65

  • 1范顺武,方向前,赵兴,赵凤东,虞和君.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗下腰椎疾病[J].中华骨科杂志,2007,27(2):81-85. 被引量:54
  • 2张烽,段广超,金国华.下腰椎极外侧椎体间融合术的应用解剖[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2007,17(11):859-861. 被引量:14
  • 3Fh A.Transplantation of a portion of the tibia into the spine for Pott's desease.J Bone Joint Surg Am.1911;57:885-886.
  • 4Fischgrund JS,Mackay M,Herkowitz HN,et al.1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies.Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis:a prospective,randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation.Spine (Phila Pa 1976).1997;22(24):2807-2812.
  • 5Carreon LY,Djurasovic M,Glassman SD,et al.Diagnostic accuracy and reliability of fine-cut CT scans with reconstructions to determine the status of an instrumented posterolateral fusion with surgical exploration as reference standard.Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2007;32(8):892-895.
  • 6Brantigan JW,Steffee AD.A carbon fiber implant to aid interbody lumbar fusion.Two-year clinical results in the first 26 patients.Spine (Phila Pa 1976).1993;18(14):2106-2107.
  • 7Min SH,Yoo JS.The clinical and radiological outcomes of multilevel minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.Eur Spine J.2013;22(5):1164-1172.
  • 8Fogel GR,Toohey JS,Neidre A,et al.Fusion assessment of posterior lumbar interbody fusion using radiolucent cages:X-ray films and helical computed tomography scans compared with surgical exploration of fusion.Spine J.2008;8(4):570-577.
  • 9Santos ER,Goss DG,Morcom RK et al.Radiologic assessment of interbody fusion using carbon fiber cages.Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2003;28(10):997-1001.
  • 10McAfee PC,Regan JJ,Geis WP,et al.Minimally invasive anterior retroperitoneal approach to the lumbar spine.Emphasis on the lateral BAK.Spine (Phila Pa 1976).1998;23(13):1476-1484.

共引文献203

同被引文献5

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部