期刊文献+

2016~2020年某医院耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌科细菌的临床分布及耐药性分析 被引量:10

An Analysis of Clinical Distribution and Drug Resistance of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae in a Hospital from 2016 to 2020
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的分析北京大学首钢医院近5年耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌科细菌(carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae,CRE)的临床分布特征和耐药变迁。方法收集北京大学首钢医院2016年1月至2020年12月期间临床分离的CRE菌株,分析其临床分布特征和药敏结果,采用WHONET 5.6软件进行数据分析。结果5年间我院共检出CRE菌株1263株,总检出率为7.2%,且各年度检出率呈逐年上升的趋势。其中分离前三位的是肺炎克雷伯菌(86.0%)、大肠埃希菌(10.6%)和阴沟肠杆菌(2.4%)。标本来源占比最大为呼吸道标本,占比为59.5%,其次是尿液标本和血液标本,分别占比19.4%和13.6%。CRE菌株科室分布前三位是重症监护室(32.6%)、呼吸监护室(19.4%)和呼吸科(19.0%),检出率前三位的是重症监护室(18.1%)、呼吸监护室(17.9%)和急诊科(15.8%)。CRE感染患者以年龄>60岁以上者为多,占比高达93.2%。CRE对头孢菌素、青霉素、喹诺酮类平均耐药率可达90.0%以上,对庆大霉素、阿米卡星和复方磺胺甲噁唑的耐药率相对较低,为81.0%、62.3%和46.2%,对粘菌素的耐药率最低,为3.5%。结论我院CRE感染呈逐年上升趋势,耐药情况严重,临床应采取积极有效的感染防控措施。 Objective To analyze the clinical distribution characteristics and drug resistance pattern of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae(CRE)in Peking University Shougang Hospital in the past 5 years.Methods CRE strains clinically isolated from Peking University Shougang Hospital from January,2016 to December,2020 were collected for the study,and related clinical characteristics and drug sensitivity results were analyzed.WHONET 5.6 software was used for data analysis.Results A total of 1,263 CRE strains were detected in our hospital from 2016 to 2020,with a total detection rate of 7.2%,showing an increasing trend yearly.The top three isolates were Klebsiella pneumoniae(86.0%),Escherichia coli(10.6%)and Enterobacter cloacae(2.4%).The largest proportion of specimen was respiratory specimens,accounting for 59.5%,followed by urine specimens and blood specimens,accounting for 19.4%and 13.6%,respectively.The top three Departments in the distribution of CRE strains were Intensive Care Unit(32.6%),Respiratory Care Unit(19.4%)and Pneumology Department(19.0%).The top three detection rates were from Intensive Care Unit(18.1%),Respiratory Care Unit(17.9%)and Emergency Department(15.8%).The majority of CRE-infected patients were 60 years old above,accounting for 93.2%.The average resistance rates of CRE to cephalosporin,penicillin and quinolone were more than 90.0%,and the resistance rates to gentamicin,amikacin and compound sulfamethoxazole were relatively low,according for 81.0%,62.3%and 46.2%,respectively,the resistance rate to colistin was the lowest,about 3.5%.Conclusion CRE infection in our hospital is increasing yearly,and the drug resistance is serious.Active and effective infection prevention and control measures should be taken in clinical practice.
作者 农金轻 张春燕 胡守奎 谷依林 王春梅 NONG Jinqing;ZHANG Chunyan;HU Shoukui;GU Yilin;WANG Chunmei(Department of Clinical Laboratory,Peking University Shougang Hospital,Beijing 100144,China;Department of Emergency,Peking University Shougang Hospital,Beijing 100144,China)
出处 《标记免疫分析与临床》 CAS 2022年第4期584-588,642,共6页 Labeled Immunoassays and Clinical Medicine
关键词 耐碳青霉烯类 肠杆菌科细菌 耐药性 Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae bacteria Drug resistance
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献50

  • 1郭萍,曹彬,刘颖梅,栗方,王珊珊,黎斌斌,杨春霞.2007—2009年住院患者临床分离菌耐药性分析[J].中国感染与化疗杂志,2010,10(6):462-467. 被引量:12
  • 2张幸国,杜小幸,张嵘,魏泽庆,俞云松,陈亚岗,李兰娟.发现一株产KPC-2型碳青霉烯酶肺炎克雷伯菌[J].中华检验医学杂志,2006,29(9):824-826. 被引量:62
  • 3Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; twenty-first informational supplement. MI00-S22. Wayne, PA:CLSI,2012.
  • 4European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version I. I, 2010-04-27.
  • 5Jones RN, Ferraro MJ, Reller LB, et al. Multicenter studies of tigecycline disk diffusion susceptibility results for Acinetobacter spp.J Clin Microbiol,2007 ,45 :227-230.
  • 6Fernrindez-Mazarrasa C, Mazarrasa 0, CalvoJ, et al. High concerntration of mananese in Mueller-Hinton agar increase MICs of tigecyc:line determined by Etest.J Clin Microbiol, 2009, 47: 827-829.
  • 7Bradford PA, Petersen PJ, Young M, et al. Tigecycline MIC testing by broth dilution requires use of fresh medium or addition of the biocatalytic oxygen-reducing reagent oxyrase to standardize the test method. Antimicrob Agents Chemother ,2005,49 :3903-3909.
  • 8Curcio D, Fernandez F. Comment on: Effect of different Mueller?Hinton agars on tigecycline disc diffusion susceptibility for Acinetobacter spp.J Antimicrob Chemother ,2008,62: 1166-1167.
  • 9Casal M, Rodriguez F,Johnson B, et al. Influence of testing methodology on the tigecycline activity profile against presumably tigecycline-nan-susceptible Acinetobacter spp.J Antimicrob Chemather, 2009, 64:69-72.
  • 10Zarkotou 0, Pournaras S, Altouvas G, et al. Comparative evaluation of tigecycline susceptibility testing methods far expanded-spectrum cephalosporin and carbapenem-resistant gram?negative pathogens.J Clin Microbiol, 2012, 50 :3747-3750.

共引文献772

同被引文献110

引证文献10

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部