摘要
法律推理中的后果涉及到司法后果和行为后果等社会后果,司法后果是裁判理由的“逻辑意蕴”,行为后果等社会后果是“或然性预测”。基于司法后果的后果主义法律推理能够满足可预测性、可普遍化和可评估这三个方面的要求,这是其得以成立的法理基础,但行为后果等社会后果不能由此被完全排除到后果主义法律推理的考虑范围之外。司法机关既不应对社会后果视而不见,也不能唯社会后果来裁判案件。从司法后果向社会后果的迈进可以弥补形式主义局限、回应社会变迁需求且在技术层面具有不可避免性,但应以一定的方式来满足前述三个方面的要求。
The consequences in legal reasoning involve judicial consequences and social consequences such as behavioral consequences.Judicial consequences are the“logical implication”of judicial reasons,behavioral consequences and other social consequences are “probability prediction”.Judicial consequences can justify decisions because they can be predicted,universalized and evaluated easily,which formed it’s jurisprudential foundation,but behavioral and social consequences cannot be completely excluded from the consideration of consequentialist legal reasoning.The judiciary should neither neglect the social consequences,nor make decisions only according to the social consequences.Moving forward from judicial consequences to behavioral and social consequences can make up for the limitations of formalism,respond to the needs of social changes,and is also inevitable at the technical level,but it should meet the requirements of the above three aspects in a certain way.
出处
《行政与法》
2022年第6期72-80,共9页
Administration and Law
基金
2021年度安徽省哲学社会科学规划项目“习近平法治思想中个案正义的主观维度论”的阶段性成果,项目编号:AHSKY2021D12。
关键词
后果主义
司法后果
社会后果
可预测性
可普遍化
consequentialism
juridical consequence
social consequence
predictability
universalization
