期刊文献+

Comparison of the prognostic value of frailty assessment tools in patients aged≥65 years hospitalized in a cardiac care unit with acute coronary syndrome 被引量:4

暂未订购
导出
摘要 BACKGROUND Frailty is associated with adverse events in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome(ACS).Our aim was to compare the prognostic value of four frailty scales in patients aged≥65 years hospitalized with ACS in a cardiac care unit(CCU).METHODS Patients aged≥65 years with ACS were included.Frailty was assessed using the Fried frailty scale(reference standard),the Edmonton Frail Scale(EFS),the FRAIL scale,and the Clinical frailty scale(CFS).The primary end point was all-cause mortality and the secondary end point was unscheduled rehospitalization.RESULTS One hundred and seventy four patients aged≥65 years with ACS were recruited.The median follow-up was 637.5 days.Frailty was identified in 41.4%,40.2%,39.1%and 36.3%patients by the Fried frailty scale,EFS,FRAIL scale and CFS,re-spectively.The agreement coefficients were 0.88,0.86,and 0.79 for the FRAIL scale,EFS and CFS,respectively.In the Cox regres-sion model,frailty was associated with all-cause mortality regardless of the scale used(univariate:hazard ratio[HR]95%CI=10.5,2.4-46.8 Fried frailty scale;12.0,2.7-53.4 FRAIL scale;7.1,2.0-25.2 EFS;8.3,2.4-29.6 CFS.Multivariate:HR=5.1,1.1-23.8 Fried frailty scale;5.7,1.2-26.8 FRAIL scale;3.7,1.0-14.0 EFS;4.2,1.1-15.9 CFS).The FRAIL scale had the highest HR.In the uni-variate analysis,frailty was associated with unscheduled rehospitalization(HR=3.2,1.7-6.0 Fried frailty scale;3.4,1.8-6.3 FRAIL scale;3.5,1.8-6.6 EFS;3.1,1.7-5.8 CFS).In the multivariate analysis,only the EFS independently predicted unscheduled rehospit-alization(HR=2.2,1.1-4.63).CONCLUSIONS Frailty assessed by the Fried frailty scale,FRAIL scale,EFS and CFS is associated with all-cause mortality and unscheduled rehospitalization in elderly patients hospitalized in a CCU with ACS.The adjusted HR of the FRAIL scale for all-cause mortality was the highest among the scales compared,whereas the EFS was an independent predictor of unscheduled re-hospitalization.These data should be taken into consideration when choosing a frailty assessment tool.
出处 《Journal of Geriatric Cardiology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2022年第5期343-353,共11页 老年心脏病学杂志(英文版)
基金 found by statutory work number 3.19/III/18, National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland.
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献6

共引文献30

同被引文献43

引证文献4

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部