摘要
采用示例的方法明确"情节严重"的含义易导致利益考量的片面化。借鉴动态体系化的方法塑造"情节严重"要件的认定规则对于平衡公共利益与私人利益具有重要价值。支撑"情节严重"判断的抽象评价要素实质上是知识产权惩罚性赔偿背后价值基础的外化明示。"亚要素"是连接抽象评价要素和具体案件事实的桥梁,指引二者之间的对应关系。立法者利用"亚要素"设置各评价要素的基础评价,即可为动态体系化的评价框架提供必要评价基准。在承认各评价要素之间存在交替与互动关系的基础上,法律适用者综合考虑各个评价要素的强弱程度及其在权重序列中的位置,即可对是否构成"情节严重"作出整体判断。
Using the method of example to clarify the meaning of "serious circumstance" will easily lead to the one-sided consideration of interests.It is of great value for balancing public interest and private interest to use the method of dynamic systematization to shape the identification rules of "serious circumstance".The abstract evaluation element supporting the judgment of "serious circumstances" is the externalization of the value basis behind intellectual property punitive damages. "Sub-elements" is a bridge connecting abstract evaluation elements and concrete case facts, guiding the corresponding relationship between them.Legislators use "sub-elements" to set up the basic evaluation of each evaluation element, which can provide the necessary evaluation benchmark for the dynamic systematic evaluation framework.On the basis of recognizing the alternation and interaction among the evaluation elements, the law applicator can make an overall judgment on whether "serious" is constituted by considering the strength of each evaluation element and its position in the weight sequence.
作者
王崇敏
王然
WANG Chongmin;WANG Ran(School of Law,Hainan University,Haikou Hainan 570228,China)
出处
《法学论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第2期143-151,共9页
Legal Forum
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目《中国特色自由贸易港的建设路径及法治保障研究》(18ZDA156)的阶段性成果。
关键词
知识产权
惩罚性赔偿
情节严重
动态体系论
intellectual property
punitive damages
serious circumstance
dynamic system theory
