摘要
关于被害人同意错误的效力认定,德日刑法学界一致存在着"全面无效说"和"法益关系错误说"的对立,此后阿梅隆教授提出的效力和归责相分离的"双层结构"的新"全面无效说"加剧了该领域的学说之争。鉴于这三种学说在认定被害人同意错误效力时的理论缺陷,构建以法益关系概念的存续为基础,以客观化考察同意是否具有任意性为核心的新"法益关系错误说"正当其时。在具体案件中,根据"法益性质"的不同,将被害人同意错误的效力认定分为"个人专属法益的效力认定"和"非专属法益的效力认定",从而将新"法益关系错误说"应用于所有涉及个人法益的领域,以证明该理论的合理性与普适性。
As for the identification of the validity of the victim’s consent error,the German and Japanese criminal law practices are consistent in the opposition of“the theory of total invalidity”and“the theory of legal interest error”.Thereafter,the new“the theory of total invalidity”,which is a“two-layer structure”with the separation of validity and imputability,proposed by Professor Amelon intensified the theoretical debate in this field.In view of the theoretical defects of these three theories in identifying the validity of the victim’s consent error,it is timely to construct a new“theory of legal interest error”based on the existence of the concept of legal interest relationship and to objectively investigate whether consent is arbitrary.In specific cases,according to the differences between the“good nature”,agreement of the effectiveness of the error that the victim can be divided into“personal exclusive decided of interests”and“non exclusive law decided”,thus the new“law benefit relationship mistake perspective”applies to all personal areas of interests,in order to prove the rationality of the theory and universality.
作者
徐前
XU Qian(School of Criminal Justice,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan Hubei 430073)
出处
《中国刑警学院学报》
2021年第6期74-83,共10页
Journal of Criminal Investigation Police University of China
基金
2021年度教育部科技部司法鉴定技术应用与社会治理学科创新引智基地资助(编号:B20077)
2022年度中南财经政法大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资助项目(编号:202210706)。
关键词
被害人同意错误
效力认定
新“法益关系错误说”
同意的任意性
法益
victim consent error
validity identification
the new“wrong theory of legal interest relation”
arbitrariness of consent
law benefit
