期刊文献+

堰塞体危险性快速评价指标与分级研究 被引量:8

Rapid evaluation on risk level of barrier dams and its classification
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 堰塞体为快速形成的自然堆积体,结构较为松散,物质组成复杂,其后续发展难以把握,需快速进行堰塞体危险性分级判断,方可为堰塞湖处置决策提供依据。通过梳理已有堰塞体溃决影响因素机制分析、堰塞湖溃决现场观察、物理模型试验和典型案例统计分析成果,并以堰塞湖库容、来水量、堰塞体物质组成和几何形态为主要判断指标,以渗透破坏、涌浪及地震作为修正因素,提出了一种堰塞体危险性量化快速评价方法,并将该方法应用于大量的典型案例判定。结果表明,判定结果与实际情况吻合较好。研究成果可为堰塞湖应急处置提供一定参考。 A barrier dam,a rapidly formed natural accumulation body,is characterized as loose structure and complex material composition,and it is difficult to predict the subsequent development.It is necessary to quickly evaluate the risk classification of a barrier body,so as to provide basis for the emergency disposal of a barrier lake.Through a mechanism analysis on influencing factors of barrier body collapse,and sorting out field observations of barrier lake collapse,physical simulation and statistical analysis of typical cases,we proposed a new rapid and quantitative risk assessment method of barrier body hazard,in which the reservoir capacity,water inflow,material composition and geometric shape of barrier body were taken as the main judgment indices,while the seepage failure,landslide-inducing surge and earthquake were taken as correction factors.After lots of cases verification,the proposed method is in good agreement with the actual situation and can be used as a reference for emergency disposal of barrier lakes.
作者 蔡耀军 栾约生 易杜靓子 罗杰 向航 CAI Yaojun;LUAN Yuesheng;YI Duliangzi;LUO Jie;XIANG Hang(CISPDR Corporation,Wuhan 430010,China;Changjiang Survey Institute of MWR,Wuhan 430011,China;Changjiang Survey,Planning,Design and Research Co.,Ltd.,Wuhan 430010,China)
出处 《人民长江》 北大核心 2022年第2期35-40,共6页 Yangtze River
基金 国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFC1508600)。
关键词 堰塞体 危险性快速评价 堰塞湖处理 barrier body rapid evaluation on hazard disposal of barrier lakes
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献37

  • 1马贵生,罗小杰.唐家山滑坡形成机制与堰塞坝工程地质特征[J].人民长江,2008,39(22):46-47. 被引量:13
  • 2谢作涛,陈肃利.唐家山堰塞坝溃坝可能性及冲刷形式初步分析[J].人民长江,2008,39(22):71-72. 被引量:5
  • 3柴贺军,刘汉超,张倬元.中国滑坡堵江事件目录[J].地质灾害与环境保护,1995,6(4):1-9. 被引量:58
  • 4赵秀绍,孙瑞民,杨凤灵.孔隙水压力计埋设过程中的问题研究[J].金属矿山,2007,36(6):47-50. 被引量:9
  • 5COSTA J E, SCHUSTER R L. Documented historical landslide dams from around the world[M]. US: U.S. Geological Survey, 1991:91 - 239.
  • 6CLAGUE J J, EVANS S G. Formation and failure of natural dams in the Canadian Cordillera[M]. Canada: Geological Survey of Canada, 1994:8 - 23.
  • 7CUI P, ZHU Y Y, HAN Y S, et al. The 12 May Wenchuan earthquake-induced landslide lakes: distribution and preliminary risk evaluation[J]. Landslides, 2009, 6(3): 209-223.
  • 8PENG M, ZHANG L M. Breaching parameters of landslide dams[J]. Landslides, 2012, 9(1): 13-31.
  • 9CHANG D S, ZHANG L M. Simulation of the erosion process of landslide dams due to overtopping considering variations in soil erodibility along depth[J]. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2010, 10(4): 933 - 946.
  • 10CENCETTI C, FREDDUZZI A, MARCHESINI I, et al. Some considerations about the simulation of breach channel erosion on landslide dams[J]. Computational Geoscienees, 2006, 10(2): 201 - 219.

共引文献131

同被引文献146

引证文献8

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部