期刊文献+

司法区块链与区块链司法 被引量:8

Judicial Blockchain and Blockchain Justice
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 实然层面的司法区块链通过可信时间戳存证在电子数据领域展现出了强大的应用前景。区块链共识机制下的“参与式”节点化验证有望形成更具应用前景的区块链司法。区块链司法联盟链可以借助分级节点保障公信机构主导共识,公众以组织机构形式参与数据校验从而实现司法活动的社会化参与。区块链架构下的“参与式”司法让公众成为共同验证的节点,让司法伪证风险的社会分担拥有了实现的可能。“参与式”司法在社区治理领域已有雏形,疫情广泛使用的各类健康码、行程轨迹开辟了公众参与和技术治理的制度范式。这种崭新司法模式通过公众参与国家治理机制的制度化建构彰显新时代中国特色社会主义法治的鲜明旗帜。 Judicial blockchain at the actual level shows a strong application prospect in the field of electronic data through credible time stamp storage.The“participatory”node verification under the blockchain consensus mechanism is expected to form a more promising blockchain justice.The blockchain judicial alliance chain can use hierarchical nodes to ensure the consensus led by public trust institutions,and the public participates in data verification in the form of an organization to achieve socialized participation in judicial activities.The“participatory”justice under the blockchain architecture allows the public to become a node for joint verification,making it possible to realize the social sharing of the risk of judicial perjury.“Participatory”justice has taken shape in the field of community governance.The various health codes and itinerary trajectories widely used in the epidemic have realized the combination of public participation and technical governance.This brand-new judicial model demonstrates the clear banner of the socialist rule of law with Chinese characteristics in the new era through the institutionalized construction of public participation in the national governance mechanism.
作者 孙梦龙 SUN Menglong(Law School,Heilongjiang University,Haerbin 150080,China)
出处 《重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版)》 2022年第1期70-78,共9页 Journal of Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Science Edition)
基金 国家社会科学基金青年项目:司法区块链的制度体系、可能风险及应对策略研究(20CFX005)。
关键词 区块链技术 技术证明 参与式 司法模式 电子数据 blockchain technology technical certification participatory judicial model electronic data
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献49

  • 1王兴伦.多中心治理:一种新的公共管理理论[J].江苏行政学院学报,2005(1):96-100. 被引量:148
  • 2宋英辉,吴宏耀,雷小政.证据法学基本问题之反思[J].法学研究,2005,27(6):52-67. 被引量:20
  • 3方兴东,王俊秀.劳伦斯·莱斯格:向迪斯尼叫板[J].软件工程师,2006(4):60-62. 被引量:1
  • 4Hardin, G. (1968) ,The Tragedy of the Commons, Science, 162,pp. 1243 - 1248.
  • 5Ostrom, E. (1990), Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 94 - 98.
  • 6Ostrom E. ( 2005), Understanding Institutional Diversity, Princeton, N J: Princeton University Press, p. 267.
  • 7Ostrom E. ( 2005 ), Understanding Institutional Diversity, Princeton, N J: Princeton University Press, p. 16.
  • 8Elinor Ostrom, Larry Schroeder & Susan Wynne (1993), Institutional Incentives and Sustainable Development: Infrastructure Policies in Perspective, Boulder, CO : Westview Press.
  • 9迈克尔·麦金尼斯.《多中心治理体制与地方公共经济》.第46页,上海三联书店,2000年版.
  • 10Elinor Ostrom, Thomas Dietz & Paul Stern(2003 ), The Struggle to Govern the Commons. Science 302 ( special issue, December 12) ,pp. 1907 - 1912.

共引文献385

同被引文献140

引证文献8

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部