摘要
《说文解字》中“从某某”与“从某从某”会意字之别,在于“从某某”之第二个“某”字为取“某”之形或义,而“从某从某”的两个“从某”都是“凡某之属皆从某”的意思,即与“某”具有共同的意指,在《说文解字》中不是例外。《说文解字》“从某”类术语与六书不是对应关系,但有配合关系,这种关系体现在“从某”类术语提示文字孳乳各阶段的节点,而六书说明了文字孳乳各阶段的途径。在“从某”类术语与六书的配合之下,《说文解字》展现出一幅巨大的文字孳乳衍生图景。
In Shuo Wen Jie Zi,the difference between the two associative characters“Cong(on the basis of)X X”and“Cong X Cong X”is that the second“X”takes the form or the meaning of“X”while the meaning of the two“Cong X”in“Cong X Cong X”should be interpreted as“all characters with X should be explained based on X”,namely,they have the same meaning as“X”,which is not an exception in Shuo Wen Jie Zi.“Cong X”terms in Shuo Wen Jie Zi are not corresponding to but cooperative with the six categories of character construction,which is reflected in the node of every stage of prompt text derivation of“Cong X”terms and the six categories of character construction declares the method of every character derivation stage.With the cooperation of“Cong X”terms and the six categories of character construction,Shuo Wen Jie Zi presents a huge picture of character derivation.
作者
马英杰
MA Ying-jie(Department of Chinese Language and Literature, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)
出处
《烟台大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2022年第1期112-124,共13页
Journal of Yantai University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)
关键词
《说文解字》
六书
会意
“从某”
Shuo Wen Jie Zi
the six categories of character construction
associative method
“Cong X”
