期刊文献+

基于Fluent探究污染颗粒对节流阀的冲蚀破坏 被引量:7

Exploring the Erosion Damage of Pollution Particles to the Throttle Valve Based on Fluent
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 该文主要研究液压油中的污染物颗粒对液压节流阀的冲蚀破坏。该文基于Fluent DPM多相流模型探讨了油液流动方向、进口流速、颗粒物(等效)直径、颗粒物形状因子对液压节流锥阀的冲蚀破坏影响。研究结果表明:正向流动冲蚀破坏主要发生在阀芯密封面,造成“麻点”破坏;反向流动主要发生在阀芯根部,造成“环状”破坏;在颗粒物等效直径为0.5 mm、形状因子从0.1变化到1的过程中,冲蚀破坏先增大后减小,形状因子φ为0.6时,破坏效果最明显;当形状因子φ≤0.6,冲蚀效果随颗粒等效直径的增大而增大,当颗粒形状因子φ>0.6,冲蚀效果随颗粒等效直径先增大后减小。 This paper mainly studies the erosion damage of hydraulic throttle by pollutant particles in hydraulic oil.Based on the Fluent DPM multiphase flow model,this paper discusses the influence of oil flow direction,inlet velocity,particle(equivalent)diameter,and particle shape factor on the erosion damage of hydraulic throttle poppet valve.The research results show that:the forward flow erosion damage mainly occurs on the valve core sealing surface,causing“pitting”damage;the reverse flow mainly occurs at the valve core root,causing“ring”damage;the equivalent diameter of particles is 0.5 mm,When the shape factor changes from 0.1 to 1,the erosion damage first increases and then decreases.When the shape factorφis 0.6,the damage effect is the most obvious;when the shape factorφ≤0.6,the erosion effect increases with the equivalent diameter of the particle When the particle shape factorφ>0.6,the erosion effect first increases and then decreases with the particle equivalent diameter.
作者 李森林 杨胜清 王素燕 林博 LI Sen-lin;YANG Sheng-qing;WANG Su-yan;LIN Bo(Guangxi Liugong Machinery Co.,Ltd.,Liuzhou 545007,China;College of Energy and Power Engineering,Lanzhou University of Technology,Lanzhou 730050,China)
出处 《液压气动与密封》 2022年第1期30-36,共7页 Hydraulics Pneumatics & Seals
基金 广西柳州市科技攻关与新产品试制(2020GABC0401)。
关键词 液压节流阀 冲蚀 形状因子 污染颗粒 hydraulic throttle valve erosion shape factor pollution particles
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献21

  • 1王丽.竖井贯流泵组装置方案在井头泵站中的应用分析[J].水泵技术,2015,0(1):30-33. 被引量:1
  • 2Menter FR.Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applicationsAIAA Journal,1994.
  • 3Johnson P L,Jones K M,Madson M D.Experimen-tal investigation of a simplified 3dhigh lift configura-tion in support of CFD validation. AIAA4217 . 2000
  • 4RUMSEY C L,LONG M,STUEVER R A,WAYMAN T R.Summary of the first AIAA CFD high lift prediction workshop. AIAA 2011 -939 . 2011
  • 5Tinoco, E.N.,Bogue, D.R.,Kao, T.-J.,Yu, N.J.,Li, P.,Ball, D.N.Progress toward CFD for full flight envelope. The Aeronautical Journal . 2005
  • 6Van den Berg,B.Boundary Layer Measurements on a Two-Dimensional Wing with Flap. NLR TR 79009 U . 1979
  • 7Menter F R,Kuntz M,Langtry R.Ten Years of Industrial Experience with the SST Turbulence Model. Turbulence,Heat andMass Transfer 4 . 2003
  • 8Slotnick J,Khodadoust A,Alonso J,Darmofal D,Gropp W,Lurie E,Mavriplis D.CFD Vision 2030Study:A Path to Revolutionary Computational Aerosciences. NASA/CR- 2014-218178 . 2014
  • 9Deng Xiaogang,Yaobing Min,Meiliang Mao,Huayong Liu,Guohua Tu,Hanxin Zhang.Further studies on geometric conservation law and applications to high-order finite difference schemes with stationary grids. Journal of Computational Physics . 2013
  • 10Kroll N,Bieler H,Deconinck H,et al.ADIGMA-A European initiative on the development of adaptive high-order variational methods for aerospace application. . 2010

共引文献19

同被引文献72

引证文献7

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部