摘要
基于不同的社会实践,产生了历史理论和方志理论两种语境。从区域社会实践到方志编纂实践,从方志哲学更新到方志体裁改造,从方志编纂、方志审定、志鉴管理、史志文献、年鉴编辑、志鉴应用,然后到志鉴发展史的研究,共同构成了方志学的学科体系。又,史志著述若不能凿通政治话语与道德话语之间的壁垒,也就难以跨越历史时空,保有著述的持久生命力。尽管道德话语体系的本质,随着不同时代人们对于道德内涵的不同赋予,实质上也在发生着不可逆转的历史性变化,但毕竟,道德话语体系较之政治话语体系,具有更深邃的洞察力和更强烈的表现力。政治话语体系所展现的是一种现实评价,道德话语体系所展现的是一种传统评价,前者具有较强的功利性质,后者则具有超越当下牵绊的审美特质。上述两种学科畛域的划分、两种学术话语的甄别和不同学术话语之间的转换,也往往会成为引领社会风尚或社会观念发生转变的一个重要标志。
Different social practices shaped two foundations for theoretical development:one for history,and the other for local records studies.The academic system of local records studies comprises a variety of factors,ranging from regional social practices to local records compilation,from local records philosophical renovation to its style reformation.Factors such as local records compilation,its examination and approval,local records and yearbooks management,history and local records literature,the compilation ad application of local records and yearbooks,as well as the research of local records and yearbooks development history,are all included in this academic system.History and local records writings cannot span wide and long,nor maintain lasting vigor and vitality,unless they break the barrier between political discourse and moral discourse.Although the essence of moral discourse system actually undergoes irreversible historical changes in line with the ever-changing moral connotations over time,it definitely has much deeper insights and stronger expressiveness than political discourse system.In contrast to the reality-oriented judgement and the utilitarian nature of political discourse system,moral discourse system demonstrates tradition-oriented judgement and an aesthetic trait that transcends the immediate restraints of the here and now.The demarcation between the two academic systems,the distinction between the two academic discourses,and the switch between such discourses,frequently symbolize important shifts that result in the transformation of social customs or social concepts.
出处
《中国地方志》
2021年第5期4-12,I0001,共10页
China Local Records
