期刊文献+

在线教学平台多元化学习效果评价体系的研究

Research on the Diversified Learning Effect Evaluation System of Online Teaching Platform
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了能充分利用在线教学平台的优势,避免传统评价方式的弊端,经过调查研究,在学习效果评价体系中应该加入包括评价指标、指标权重、评价量规等在内的多元化元素。本文描述了在线教学平台多元化评价体系的构建。首先,从应用场景角度分析,确定了该体系包括的应用阶段和参与者;其次,对评价体系的影响因素结构进行了分析,明确了各个评价因素及层次结构;然后,针对不同性质的评价因素分别研究了计算和表示方法;最后,利用模糊综合评价方法,将不同性质的因素进行综合,构建形成在线教学平台多元化学习效果评价体系。 In order to make full use of the advantages of online teaching platform and avoid the drawbacks of traditional evaluation methods,after investigation and research,diversified elements including evaluation in-dexes,index weights,evaluation gauges and so on should be added into the evaluation system of learning ef-fect.This paper describes the construction of a diversified evaluation system for online teaching platform.Fi-rstly,from the perspective of application scenarios,the application stages and participants of the system are determined.Secondly,the influence factor structure of the evaluation system is analyzed,and each evaluation factor and hierarchy structure are defined.Then,the calculation and expression methods for different evalua-tion factors are studied respectively.Finally,the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is used to synthesize the factors with different natures to construct a diversified learning effect evaluation system of the online tea-ching platform.
作者 弭妍 乔贝 MI Yan;QIAO Bei(Shandong Vocational University of Foreign Affairs,Shandong Weihai 264500,China)
出处 《新一代信息技术》 2020年第17期12-17,共6页 New Generation of Information Technology
关键词 在线教学平台 多元化评价体系 学习效果评价 模糊综合评价方法 Online teaching platform Diversification evaluation system Evaluation of learning effect Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献37

  • 1邱宜干.翻转课堂的发展阶段问题浅析[J].中外企业家,2020,0(1):163-164. 被引量:5
  • 2柳斌.五谈关于素质教育的思考[J].人民教育,1997(12):2-6. 被引量:11
  • 3莫俊华.同伴互评:提高大学生写作自主性[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2007,30(3):35-39. 被引量:214
  • 4[英]杰勒德·德兰迪.知识社会中的大学[M].北京:北京大学出版社.2010:56.
  • 5刘延东.学习贯彻党的十七届六中全会精神开创高校哲学社会科学繁荣发展新局面[EB/OL]. http://w^rw.moe.edu.(*n/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/moe.176/201201/129616.html, 2012-1-18/2012-5-7.
  • 6李卫红.以改进科研评价为突破口促进高校哲学社会科学健康发展[N].光明日报,2011-11-25(14).
  • 7Ashley, K. , & Goldin, I. (2011 ). Toward an enhanced com- puter-supported peer review in legal education [ C ]. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Sys- tems:77-88.
  • 8Goldin, I. (2012). Accounting for peer reviewer bias with Bayesian models[A]. Proceedings of the Workshop on Intelligent Support for Learning Groups of the 11 th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems[ C]. 122-140.
  • 9Goldin, 1., & Ashley, K. (2011). Peering inside peer review with Bayesian models[ C]. Proceedings of the 15th International Confer- ence on Artificial Intelligence in Education, AIED'I 1:90-97.
  • 10Russell, A. A. (2004). Calibrated peer review: A writing and critical-thinking instructional tool [ J ]. Teaching Tips: Innovations in Undergraduate Science Instruction: 54-70.

共引文献201

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部