期刊文献+

Differentiating gastric cancer and gastric lymphoma using texture analysis(TA)of positron emission tomography(PET) 被引量:7

原文传递
导出
摘要 Background:Texture analysis(TA)can quantify intra-tumor heterogeneity using standard medical images.The present study aimed to assess the application of positron emission tomography(PET)TA in the differential diagnosis of gastric cancer and gastric lymphoma.Methods:The pre-treatment PET images of 79 patients(45 gastric cancer,34 gastric lymphoma)between January 2013 and February 2018 were retrospectively reviewed.Standard uptake values(SUVs),first-order texture features,and second-order texture features of the grey-level co-occurrence matrix(GLCM)were analyzed.The differences in features among different groups were analyzed by the two-way Mann-Whitney test,and receiver operating characteristic(ROC)analysis was used to estimate the diagnostic efficacy.Results:InertiaGLCM was significantly lower in gastric cancer than that in gastric lymphoma(4975.61 vs.11,425.30,z=-3.238,P=0.001),and it was found to be the most discriminating texture feature in differentiating gastric lymphoma and gastric cancer.The area under the curve(AUC)of inertiaGLCM was higher than the AUCs of SUVmax and SUVmean(0.714 vs.0.649 and 0.666,respectively).SUVmax and SUVmean were significantly lower in low-grade gastric lymphoma than those in high grade gastric lymphoma(3.30 vs.11.80,2.40 vs.7.50,z=-2.792 and-3.007,P=0.005 and 0.003,respectively).SUVs and first-order greylevel intensity features were not significantly different between low-grade gastric lymphoma and gastric cancer.EntropyGLCM12 was significantly lower in low-grade gastric lymphoma than that in gastric cancer(6.95 vs.9.14,z=-2.542,P=0.011)and had an AUC of 0.770 in the ROC analysis of differentiating low-grade gastric lymphoma and gastric cancer.Conclusions:InertiaGLCM and entropyGLCM were the most discriminating features in differentiating gastric lymphoma from gastric cancer and low-grade gastric lymphoma from gastric cancer,respectively.PET TA can improve the differential diagnosis of gastric neoplasms,especially in tumors with similar degrees of fluorodeoxyglucose uptake.
出处 《Chinese Medical Journal》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2021年第4期439-447,共9页 中华医学杂志(英文版)
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献42

  • 1Sith Phongkitkarun,Vithya Varavithya,Toshiki Kazama,Silvana C Faria,Martha V Mar,Donald A Podoloff,Homer A Macapinlac.Lymphomatous involvement of gastrointestinal tract: Evaluation by positron emission tomography with ^(18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2005,11(46):7284-7289. 被引量:7
  • 2Punit Sharma,Sudhir KC Suman,Harmandeep Singh,Atul Sharma,Chandrasekhar Bal,Arun Malhotra,Rakesh Kumar.Primary gastric lymphoma: utility of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography for detecting relapse after treatment[J].Leukemia & Lymphoma.2013(5)
  • 3Fu Liping,Li Hongming,Wang Hui,Xu Baixuan,Fan Yong,Tian Jiahe.SUVmax/THKmax as a Biomarker for Distinguishing Advanced Gastric Carcinoma from Primary Gastric Lymphoma. PloS one . 2012
  • 4Kawamura T,Kusakabe T,Sugino T,Watanabe K,Fukuda T,Nashimoto A,Honma K,Suzuki T.Expression of glucose transporter-1 in human gastric carcinoma: association with tumor aggressiveness, metastasis, and patient survival. Cancer . 2001
  • 5Erito Mochiki,Hiroyuki Kuwano,Hiroyuki Katoh,Takayuki Asao,Noboru Oriuchi,Keigo Endo.??Evaluation of 18F-2-deoxy-2-fluoro-d-glucose Positron Emission Tomography for Gastric Cancer(J)World Journal of Surgery . 2004 (3)
  • 6Andriani A,Zullo A,Di Raimondo F,Patti C,Tedeschi L,Recine U,Caruso L,Bonanno G,Chiarenza A,Lizzani G,Miedico A,Romanelli A,Costa A,Linea C,Marrone C,Mirto S,Mistretta A,Montalbano L,Restivo G,Vinci M,Bibas M,Hassan C,Stella F,Cottone M,Morini S.Clinical and endoscopic presentation of primary gastric lymphoma:a multicentre study. Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics . 2006
  • 7M Hoffmann,S W?hrer,A Becherer,A Chott,B Streubel,K Kletter,M Raderer.18F-Fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography in lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue: histology makes the difference. Annals of Oncology . 2006
  • 8Im HJ,Pak K,Cheon GJ, et al.Prognostic value of volumetric parameters of (18)F-FDG PET in non-small-cell lung cancer:a meta-analysis. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging . 2015
  • 9Yasumitsu Hirose,Hayato Kaida,Masatoshi Ishibashi,Jun Uozumi,Shunji Arikawa,Seiji Kurata,Naofumi Hayabuchi,Keita Nakahara,Koichi Ohshima.??Comparison Between Endoscopic Macroscopic Classification and F-18 FDG PET Findings in Gastric Mucosa–Associated Lymphoid Tissue Lymphoma Patients(J)Clinical Nuclear Medicine . 2012 (2)
  • 10Ahmet Turan Ilica,Kenan Kocacelebi,Recep Savas,Asli Ayan.??Imaging of Extranodal Lymphoma With PET/CT(J)Clinical Nuclear Medicine . 2011 (10)

共引文献10

同被引文献48

引证文献7

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部