摘要
本文以"节点+同台+站厅"为换乘方式的"F"型三线换乘站、以"节点+通道+站厅"为换乘方式的"H"型三线换乘站、以"站厅+通道"为换乘方式的"H"型三线换乘站为研究对象,应用AnyLogic软件进行动态仿真,以空间服务水平、平均换乘距离、平均换乘时间等指标,分析不同站型、不同换乘方式的三线换乘效果。结果表明,"F"型空间服务水平优于"H"型车站,但后者的平均换乘时间、平均换乘距离普遍优于前者。对于"H"型车站,以"节点+通道+站厅"的组合,乘客的换乘时间、换乘距离均优于"站厅+通道"的组合。但因后者客流较为分散,中部站厅用于换乘的楼扶梯端部或换乘通道出入口不易发生拥堵,空间服务水平优于前者。
This paper studies the"F-type"three-line transfer station with"node+platform+station hall"as the transfer mode,the"H-type"three-line transfer station with the"node+channel+station hall"as the transfer mode and the"H-type"three-line transfer station with the"channel+station hall"as the transfer mode.Using the dynamic simulation of AnyLogic,the average passenger transfer time,average travel distance,space service level and other indicators are used to analyze the impact of different station types and different transfer modes on the three-line transfer effect.The results show that the space service level of"F type"station is better than that of"H"station,but the average transfer time and average transfer distance of the latter are generally better than the former.For"H-type"station,the combination of"node+channel+station hall"is better than the combination of"channel+station hall"in transfer time and transfer distance.At the level of space service,due to the relatively dispersed passenger flow in the latter,congestion is not easy to occur at the end of the escalator or transfer channel used for transfer in the central station hall.For this reason,latter is superior to the former in terms of the level of space services.
作者
刘善维
张杨
LIU Shanwei;ZHANG Yang(School of Transportation and Logistics,Southwest Jiaotong University,Chengdu 610031,China;National United Engineering Laboratory of Integrated and Intelligent Transportation,Chengdu 611756,China)
出处
《综合运输》
2021年第1期82-86,109,共6页
China Transportation Review
基金
成都轨道交通13号线一期工程换乘车站功能评价(R113620H01060)。
关键词
三线换乘站
车站站型
换乘方式
动态仿真
ANYLOGIC
Triple-line station for urban rail transit transfer
Station type
Transfer mode
Dynamical simulation
AnyLogic
