期刊文献+

全球互联网治理困境:制度缺失与治理赤字 被引量:1

The Dilemma of Global Internet Governance:Institution Absence and Governance Deficit
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着信息技术的发展,尤其是“数字革命”引起的数字经济和数字社会转变,人类社会脆弱性增强导致全球互联网治理需求急剧上升。然而,由于全球性互联网制度缺失,网络生态环境持续恶化,治理出现碎片化、集团化趋势,治理赤字不断扩大。全球互联网制度缺失主要体现为行为制度、全球性制度以及硬法制度缺失,根源既包括治理主体间的认知和偏好差异等因素,也包括制度设计理念僵化、制度建构平台与方向缺失等因素。在治理主体的认知和偏好差异短期内无法消除的情况下,转变制度设计理念与创新制度设计形式成为最后选择。中国作为互联网大国有责任引领治理摆脱困境,通过倡导能够兼顾各方偏好、制度设计主体和分工明确、以联合国为基础搭建广泛协商平台的“中国方案”,实现“网络空间命运共同体”倡议落地生根。 With the development of information technology, especially the transformation of the digital economy and digital society caused by the "digital revolution", the increased vulnerability of human society has led to a sharp rise in global Internet governance needs. However, due to the lack of the global Internet institution, the cyberspace environment continues to deteriorate, governance appears fragmented and grouped and governance deficits continue to expand. The lack of the global Internet institution is mainly reflected in the lack of behavioral institution, global institution and hard law. The root causes include not only factors such as differences in cognition and preference among governance subjects, but also factors such as rigid institutional design concepts, lack of institutional construction platforms and directions. Because the differences in the cognition and preference of governance subjects cannot be eliminated in the short term, changing the institution design concept and innovating the institution design becomes the final choice. As a major Internet country, China has the responsibility to lead governance out of its deadlock. By advocating a "Chinese plan" that takes into account the preferences of all parties, has a clear institutional design subject and division of labor, and is based on a broad consultation platform established by the United Nations, the "Cyberspace Community with a Shared Future" initiative takes root.
作者 齐尚才 QI Shang-cai(School of International Relations,University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 102488,China)
出处 《廊坊师范学院学报(社会科学版)》 2020年第4期19-27,共9页 Journal of Langfang Normal University(Social Sciences Edition)
基金 中国社会科学院大学新文科项目“国际互联网规则的制定研究”。
关键词 全球互联网治理 治理赤字 制度缺失 中国方案 global Internet governance governance deficit absence of institution Chinese plan
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献73

  • 1Bruce Jones, Carols Pascual and Stephen John Stedman, Power and Responsibility: Building International Order in an Era of Transnational Threats, Washington, D.C. : Brookings Institution Press, 2009.
  • 2Susan Strange, The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
  • 3Margaret E. Keck and Kathryn Sikkink, Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics, Ithaca : Cornell University Press, 1998.
  • 4A.F.K. Organski and Jacek Kugler, The War Leger, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1950.
  • 5Robert Gilpin, War and Change in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.
  • 6John Mearsheimer, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, New York: W.W. Norton, 2001.
  • 7罗伯特·杰维斯著,秦亚青译.《国际政治中的知觉与错误知觉》,北京:世界知识出版社2003年版.
  • 8Stephen Krasner, ed., International Regimes, Ithaca: Comell University Press, 1983, p. 2.
  • 9Robert O. Keohan, After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in World Politics, Princeton: Princeton Uni- versity Press, 1984.
  • 10Bruce Jones, Carols Pascual and Stephen John Stedman, Power and Responsibility: Building International Order in an Era of Transnational Threat, 2009.

共引文献377

同被引文献51

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部