期刊文献+

失效模式与效应分析对直肠癌患者的术后效果分析 被引量:5

Effect of failure mode and effect analysis on postoperative efficacy for patients with rectal cancer
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨失效模式与效应分析(FMEA)对直肠癌患者术后并发症及切口愈合质量的影响。方法将122例直肠癌手术治疗患者随机分为观察组和对照组,每组61例。对照组采用常规干预,观察组在对照组基础上采用FMEA干预,比较2组患者并发症发生情况及切口愈合质量。结果干预期间,观察组并发症发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干预后,观察组切口愈合优秀率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对直肠癌术后患者采用FMEA干预能有效降低直肠癌患者术后并发症发生率,提高切口愈合质量。 Objective To investigate the effect of failure mode and effect analysis(FMEA)on postoperative complications and the quality of wound healing in rectal cancer patients.Methods A total of 122 patients with rectal cancer treated by surgery were randomly divided into observation group and control group,with 61 cases in each group.The control group received routine intervention,and the observation group used FMEA intervention on the basis of the control group.The occurrence of complications and the quality of wound healing were compared between the two groups.Results During the intervention,the incidence of complications in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group(P<0.05).After intervention,the excellent rate of incision healing in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion FMEA intervention can effectively reduce the incidence of postoperative complications and improve the quality of wound healing in rectal cancer patients.
作者 任爽 王冠忠 吴倩 REN Shuang;WANG Guanzhong;WU Qian(Surgical Ward for Colorectal Cancer and Anal Disease,Shengjing Hospital Affiliated to China Medical University,Shenyang,Liaoning,110000)
出处 《实用临床医药杂志》 CAS 2020年第21期12-14,共3页 Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice
关键词 直肠癌 失效模式与效应分析 并发症 切口愈合质量 rectal cancer failure mode and effect analysis complications quality of wound healing
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献163

  • 1管咏梅,沈南平,何萍萍.应用医疗失效模式与效应分析降低气管插管非计划性拔管率[J].上海交通大学学报(医学版),2011,31(9):1355-1357. 被引量:12
  • 2杜龙庭,朱襄明,李军,杨朝湘,伍玉芬,李葳葳.直肠癌术后放化疗后近期MRI观察[J].放射学实践,2004,19(7):507-509. 被引量:1
  • 3许苹,许敏,刑茂迎,连斌,杨志平,罗旭.FMEA在医疗风险管理中的应用以及局限性[J].现代预防医学,2007,34(1):51-52. 被引量:73
  • 4Luijendijk RW,Hop WC,van den Tol MP,et al.A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia[J].N Engl J Med,2000;343(6):392-8.
  • 5Hodgson NC,Malthaner RA,Ostbye T.The search for an ideal method of abdominal fascial closure:a meta-analysis[J].Ann Surg,2000;231(3):436-42.
  • 6Skandalakis JE,Gray SW,Rowe JS.Complications of abdominal incisions.Anatomical Complication in General Surgery[M].New York:Mc Graw-Hill Book Company,1983:299.
  • 7Reason J. Human error: models and management [J]. BMJ, 2000, 320 : 768- 770.
  • 8Gawande A A, Zinner M J, Studdert D M, et al. Analysis of errors reported by surgeons at three teaching hospitals [J]. Surgery,2003, 133(6) :614-621.
  • 9Duwe B,Fuchs B D, Hansen Flaschen J. Failure mode and effects a nalysis application to critical care medicine[J]. Crit Care Clin,2005, 21(1):21-30.
  • 10Christina N, Cote J, Lebel D, et al. The AMELIE project: failure mode, effects and criticality analysis: a model to evaluate the nurse medication administration process on the floor [ J]. J Eval Clin Pract,2013,19(1) :192-199.

共引文献251

同被引文献71

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部